

read Settlers.
“uhh, I don’t like settlers because Sakai criticized Lenin” - take I’ve heard before
a lot of people we appreciate in this community did. A criticism isn’t a condemnation, but rather an acknowledgement of the difference in material conditions that make up the base of a revolution in countries that are settler-states or aren’t in this specific case.
“In 1858 Engels sarcastically described the tamed British workers in the bluntest terms: “The English proletariat is actually becoming more and more bourgeois, so that this most bourgeois of all nations is apparently aiming ultimately at the possession of a bourgeois aristocracy and a bourgeois proletariat alongside the bourgeoisie. For a nation which exploits the whole world this is to a certain extent justifiable.”
(2) Britain was the Imperial Rome, the Amerikan Empire of that day - a nation which “feasted” on the exploitation of colonies around the entire world. Engels, as a communist, didn’t make lame excuses for the corrupted English workers, but exposed them. He held the English workers accountable to the world proletariat for their sorry political choices.”
also give Conditions of the Working Class a good reread.










You’re a walking, mealy-mouthed advertisement. Your only resume you have is astroturfing the fediverse and being a worthless fuck-up who tells starving Palestinians to “get a job”.