To feed your food preferences:

AI: ~560–800 Billion Liters Annual usage

Beef: ~4,387 Trillion Liters (for feed alone)

AI: Minimal land use

Beef: 44% of global habitable land

AI: ~20,400 tons CO2 (per large model)

Beef: ~14.5% of all global emissions

AI: Electronic waste, local heat islands

Beef: Methane, manure runoff, “dead zones”

A single quarter-pound beef burger requires between 40 and 70 gallons of surface/groundwater

A heavy AI user (50 queries/day for a year) consumes roughly 14 to 48 gallons of water annually

Beef driven industrial agriculture is the #1 driver of global deforestation. In the Amazon, cattle ranching is responsible for at least 75% of forest loss. This is causing ecological collapse.

All this to torture cows. Fucking stop it. Stop it NOW.

      • lobut@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 days ago

        We have many alternatives to meat that are delicious and satiating. It’s one of the best things we can do for the planet. It’s not easy for everyone to easily cut themselves off from eating meat but it would be great if people start reducing it.

    • stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      How so?

      Besides all the vegans, vegetarians, and people who can’t afford or don’t have access to beef, there are roughly 1.2 billion Hindus in the world, most of whom don’t eat beef for religious reasons.

      I don’t see how beef can be irreplaceable when literally billions of people don’t eat beef and are perfectly healthy without it.

    • catscape@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      our planet can’t be replaced either, so which is more important to you?

      • Logi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 days ago

        We can’t digest the grasses that cows do with their 4 stomachs and rumination, so that argument is bull. But of course you’re right that beef can replaced. We’ll just have to hit the legumes and plants that we can actually digest.

        • Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          If only there was some other way of preparing food making it more digestible and its nutrients more available without us needing 4 stomachs 🤔

          • Logi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            Of course there is. I’m just saying that the existence of cows doesn’t prove anything, since they are a different organism from us with different capabilities, like digesting things that we can’t. Using bullshit arguments doesn’t help whatever cause you think you’re helping.

            • Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              My point was more about the plants than the cows, any nutrient in beef being ultimately derived from plants. And we may not have 4 stomachs but have other ways of accessing those nutrients. Maybe that clarifies somewhat 🤷🏼

    • Midnitte@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Conversely, no one needs AI. That could be stopped without any modification to people’s diet and the logistical changes that would require.

      Its a “low hanging fruit”