I feel like it’s well known that kissing up to Trump is the wrong move. Deep down he hates that and doesn’t respect it. He might bluster at first but eventually he respects people who stand up to him or at least don’t give in and kiss his ass (Kim, Sheinbaum, Xi).
Gorbachev sending a letter to George H. W. Bush (which he would not respond to) practically begging to tell what kind of government he would like to see in the USSR is my #1 all time pathetic boot-licking given to a US president by a foreign leader. But Rutte’s “daddy” comment is a close second.
Schumer is a hardcore Zionist and always has been. He won’t publicly express it, but I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s delighted to see what Trump is trying to do to Iran.
You know, the thought has occurred to me that it’s not impossible some sort of international incident occurs due Iran’s 0:30 time zone difference.
Netanyahu’s office:
“The United States has told Israel that it is committed to achieving these goals, shared by the US, Israel and Israel’s regional allies, in the upcoming negotiations.”
“The two-weeks ceasefire does not include Lebanon.”
I read that as “we agree to this ceasefire and will uphold it except in areas we don’t feel like it”. Perfectly on-brand for Israel.
Netanyahu saying Israel supports the ceasefire but that it doesn’t apply to Lebanon.
Couldn’t have happened to any nicer people….
I had assumed the part about “ending the war against all components of the Axis of Resistance” to include Lebanon.
I thought one of the points involved ceasing hostilities against the Axis of Resistance on all fronts, which I assume would include southern Lebanon, no?
If Trump did actually agree to these 10 points, then Katie bar the door because no way I believe the US will honor this and Trump is just saying yes to everything to buy time for an invasion.
But I also trust Iran, I think what they’ve accomplished over the last 5 weeks has earned our benefit of the doubt.
I for one am very thankful for our beautiful Democratic Party, which while all this craziness has entered a fever pitch, they have been loudly and boldly speaking out against this every minute of the day and not focusing on unimportant matters like trying to trash talk Hasan Piker and taking personal vacations to the beach.
People who are just now starting to see this are also expecting to see Europe stand up to Trump (because why would any sovereign nation take orders from Trump of all people), but instead are seeing him constantly taking shots at them and the Europeans just keep coming back asking for more, practically begging to be seen as Trump’s good little doggies. I see people confused at this at first but they’re starting to connect the dots I think.
I don’t disagree, I just happen to find the theory that the US really only entered the war not because of high ideals but because if France and the UK lost, then the US would be left holding the bag as they defaulted on their loans, to be very plausible.
But when you dig into the history of the US in the 20th and 21st centuries, you start to notice this isn’t just a “Trump” thing. Outside of WW1 and WW2 (though the US had spurious reasons for joining WW1), the US has been the bad guys in every other instance.
The US is the imperialist hegemon, Trump has just been more open about it.
My hunch is that the presence of the E-4B is more for the escalation of war rather than a nuclear strike. The idea is to keep the president / military leadership alive in a nuclear attack.
As far as I can tell the last time it was used was on 9/11/2001 (it was filmed circling DC but I don’t think W actually used it).
I think they’re bringing it in to make Trump feel like a big boy war commander. Gut says we’re gonna see a big escalation but not necessarily nukes.
From Drop Site’s twitter
Chinese civilians with technical backgrounds are increasingly posting detailed military analysis online aimed at helping Iran counter U.S. forces, in a growing grassroots trend across Chinese social media, according to the South China Morning Post.
The effort appears informal and unpaid, with engineers and STEM-trained users sharing tactics, simulations, and breakdowns of U.S. systems — including mapping U.S. military sites, outlining missile strategies targeting aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf, and modeling defenses against a potential U.S. landing on Iran’s Kharg Island oil terminal. Some content has gone viral, including tutorials on targeting advanced platforms like the F-35.
On March 14, a video by an account called “Laohu Talks World,” subtitled in Persian, outlined how Iran could use low-cost systems to target an F-35, drawing tens of millions of views. Five days later, Iran claimed it had struck a U.S. F-35.
The creator studied at Northwestern Polytechnical University, a major Chinese defense research institution. “He is not short of money. He makes videos just for fun,” a source told the Post.
It would appear that posting is indeed praxis…
A couple important caveats:
That clip is not from Fox News. It’s from a local FOX affiliate that may or may not share the views of Fox News (I don’t believe they are the same company at all). If you’re not American I’m not really sure how to explain the difference.
Also the context of the quote indicates the guest is talking about a dozen generals in total under Hegseth/Trump and cites someone who was purged a while ago, there’s no indication any other top positions have been purged in the present other than the 3 today.
I feel like I need to re-read The Eighteenth Brumaire again, it’s been a while. There were some comparisons between Trump and Louis Bonaparte in his first admin but it didn’t really seem to line up all that well, it felt a bit like a lazy comparison. But the point is Bonaparte eventually got the bourgeoisie to get in line behind him despite his incompetency, so maybe the comparison to Trump is more apt now than it was back during Trump 1.
Trump is objectively a greater threat to attack another NATO country than Putin is.