The Reason Some People Resent Animal Lovers
Behind the resentment towards animal lovers hides a personal emotional deprivation.
If people focused more on those who abuse animals rather than on those who genuinely love them, the world would be a much better place.
I believe that many of us have, in one way or another, encountered people who resent those who have a deep affection for animals. I am not referring to situations in which an owner fails to clean up after their dog, allows them to run through a park without a leash and frighten others, or otherwise behaves irresponsibly or puts someone in danger.
I am talking about genuine affection for animals: people who kiss them, speak to them lovingly, care for them as they would care for their own children, prefer spending time with animals to socializing with people, and show them compassion and empathy. Why does this kind of love bother some people to the point that they feel the need to criticize those who express it?
There is a particular moral judgment that often comes into play: the idea that investing emotionally in animals rather than in humans is a sign of selfishness or antisocial behavior. But isn’t it selfish to believe that love must be reserved for certain species or distributed only among certain individuals? Rather than being a sign of antisocial behavior, doesn’t the ability to care for another living being demonstrate a broad capacity for empathy?
Animals are vulnerable in the face of human power. Loving and caring for a being that cannot offer us anything in return is not a sign of selfishness; it reflects compassion, emotional depth, and willingness to care without expecting anything in return.
Get Manuela’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
There is a deeper emotional reason behind the resentment directed toward people who love animals so openly: a sense of emotional deprivation, accompanied by envy.
When people see the affection, attention, and care an animal receives, it can trigger a painful awareness of what they feel is missing from their own lives. They may not feel loved, valued, or emotionally fulfilled, or they may have spent much of their lives without experiencing the kind of affection they needed. Witnessing someone else’s happiness and attachment, even between a human and an animal, can act as a mirror, reflecting something they themselves long for.
There is also another, more intellectual-sounding justification: anthropocentrism, the belief that humans are the masters of the planet and that animals are less valuable. This worldview can be used as a shield for their ego. Power and dominance over weaker beings are the way for them to feel like “someone” because they didn’t experience how to feel worthy through love.
These factors may sometimes overlap. A lack of emotional fulfillment can manifest itself as envy, resentment, or a desire to assert dominance. When someone mocks or attacks another person’s affection for animals, the reaction may say a lot about their own emotional relationship with love.
Of course, this is not a universal rule. There are people who are not happy, people who did not receive much love throughout their lives, people who are not emotionally fulfilled, but they still remain compassionate toward others, including animals. Those people are just more aware and self-aware.
Love and compassion are ways of relating to other living beings. The ability to connect with another being does not have to stop at the boundaries of our own species. A person can feel empathy toward a human, an animal, or any other sentient being because they recognize that another living creature can experience consciousness, joy, fear, and pain.
It is not about species; it is about the capacity to feel. And that capacity is not limited to humans, and should not be.
