When vulnerability becomes performance
I just reread one of my old articles here. It was a raw, honest piece about a shameful chapter of my life, written with a singular purpose: to redirect both the spotlight and the reader toward the One who saved and transformed me.
2024 really was that year when I had a lot of time on my hands to write poignant stuff, and reading this particular article again filled me with warmth — at least until I scrolled down to the responses beneath it.
Most of the comments said almost nothing about the actual subject but instead praised me for how vulnerable I’d been. I read those compliments, not with the pleasure I had felt when I first received them, but with uncertainty, a niggling sense that something wasn’t quite right.
These were emotions that had never really crossed my mind until recent months, when I had begun holding my actions under greater scrutiny. This time, it was my vulnerability under examination.
You see, there was a time when vulnerability felt refreshing, like a much-needed corrective. And it still does, in fairness, have its place. People speaking honestly about failure, shame, grief, and other feelings we’ve long been taught to hide creates room for others to feel less alone in their own humanity. It challenges the exhausting performance of perfection, reminding us that beneath our polished surfaces, we are all fragile in some way.
But lately, I find myself questioning whether our cultural embrace of vulnerability has always been matched by an equal commitment to wisdom — and my conclusion is rarely optimistic. So it’s not vulnerability itself that makes me uneasy, but vulnerability for the sake of it.
I am beginning to think we should be more responsible about how we unload the weight of our personal experiences and histories onto others. More honest about why we share. Because while it is true that sharing does make others genuinely feel seen, that speaking openly about pain dismantles shame and creates solidarity, and that naming a difficult experience can be part of healing itself (both for the sharer and the audience), this is also true: sharing can — and often unwittingly does — also become a pursuit of validation. It can become a way of keeping attention on ourselves, sustaining relevance, and receiving admiration for being ‘raw,’ ‘real,’ or ‘brave.’
This is especially true in this era complicated by social media and the plethora of other digital communities. With millions of pieces of content competing for audience attention, platforms tend to reward emotional intensity.
Want attention? You can’t do half-measures. Get ready to be funnier, angrier, more shocking, more articulate, more relatable — or more vulnerable — than everyone else.
For those of us whose natural interests or talents involve sharing ideas and building communities, it is easy to begin believing that our value lies in how much access we are willing to grant strangers into our inner worlds. And once we have either run out of surface-level things to say or discovered that more intimate revelations attract greater attention and engagement, we may find ourselves converting private experiences into content even before we have fully processed those experiences ourselves.
Get Klé’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Yet, we rarely think or talk about what this can do to other people. We rarely consider the possibility that we may, at times, be guilty of emotional dumping. Because while vulnerability can build connection, emotional dumping simply (and mindlessly?) transfers emotional weight.
You may recall once finding yourself an unwilling custodian of someone’s secret or unresolved trauma. Or a participant in an emotional intimacy you never consciously consented to. Think about how awkward that felt, wanting out of that conversation while simultaneously feeling obligated to preserve the dignity and confidence of the person sharing.
Sometimes listeners are not prepared to carry the details we hand them. And in our pursuit of expression and authenticity, we forget that disclosure affects not only the speaker, but also the audience.
Of course, silence is not necessarily wisdom either. As I have already conceded, I see genuine virtue in sharing our experiences — and not just the glossy, picture-perfect ones. I know how many people, myself included, discovered permission to be human because someone else spoke first. Many wounds continue to fester in darkness because nobody dares to articulate them aloud.
So this is not an argument for emotional repression or performative stoicism. Perhaps it is better understood as a call for discernment.
So rather than ask, “Should(n’t) I be vulnerable?” Maybe we should ask instead:
What am I sharing?
Why am I sharing it?
Who am I sharing it with?
And who is the sharing ultimately serving?
(My ego? A young person who genuinely needs direction? Or some unresolved part of myself desperately seeking closure?)
Mature vulnerability has boundaries. It understands that privacy is neither aloofness nor dishonesty and that intimacy should often be earned rather than broadcast.
Again, there are no universal rules for sharing. All this essay is asking for is a little more introspection and responsibility in an age that increasingly mistakes exposure for depth.
