The Chemistry Hiding in My Sportswear Wardrobe
I have, honestly, quite a lot of sportswear in my wardrobe haha
After years of going to the gym and months of playing tennis, I somehow ended up with clothes made from all kinds of synthetic fabrics. Some are made from polyester and elastane, while others are made from nylon and elastane (Picture 1).
At first, I never really thought much about it. To me, they were just sports clothes.
But after wearing and washing them over and over again, I started noticing something.
They don’t actually feel the same.
Some feel firm and structured. Some feel softer and smoother. Some feel more stretchy, while others feel like they hold their shape better. Even the way they feel against my skin can be completely different.
And that’s when my chemistry brain started to kick in.
I mean, why would two pieces of sportswear that both contain elastane feel so different?
Is it because of the polymer itself? Is it because of how the molecules interact with water? Or does the way the fibers are made have something to do with it?
So, instead of simply accepting that one pair of leggings and tops feels softer than another, I decided to look at what was actually happening at the molecular level.
Because apparently, even my sportswear can’t escape chemistry haha!
Let’s start with elastane.
Let’s start with the material that makes sportswear stretch: elastane, also known as spandex.
Elastane is a polyurethane-based polymer made of soft, flexible segments and harder segments. When the fabric is stretched, its polymer chains change conformation and become more extended. When the force is released, the chains tend to return toward their original, more disordered state. That molecular behavior is what gives elastane its remarkable stretch and recovery.
But elastane is only part of the story.
Get Fathiy RA’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Two pieces of sportswear can contain elastane and still feel completely different. A polyester–elastane fabric may feel firmer and more structured, while nylon–elastane often feels softer and smoother.
So, if elastane provides the stretch, the other polymer determines much of what happens around it.
And that’s where polyester and nylon become interesting.
Polyester contains ester groups -R-COO-R’, whereas nylon is a polyamide containing amide groups -R-CONH-R’, (See Picture 2) and that difference is chemically meaningful. The amide groups in nylon are capable of strong intermolecular hydrogen bonding (Picture 3) that gives nylon different intermolecular interactions from polyester.
Because nitrogen and oxygen are more electronegative than carbon and hydrogen, these bonds have uneven electron distributions, making the functional groups polar. But, polarity is the only the beginning.
Fabric feel isn’t determined by polarity alone, but it also depends on polymer chain structure, crystallinity, molecular orientation, elastane percentage, fabric density, etc.
it would be tempting to say that nylon feels softer because it is more polar dan polyester. but polymer materials rarely surrender their secrets that easily. macroscopic properties are emergent properties.
Nylon’s more polar amide groups allow stronger interaction with water contributing to its higher moisture regain, while polyester is considerably more hydrophobic.
“a fabric that absorbs more water isn’t necessarily better at managing sweat”
Moisture management depends not only on how much water the polymer absorbs, but also on capillary transport, fiber geometry, fabric construction, surface properties, and drying behavior.
Nah and suddenly, the way I wash my gym clothes started looking different to me.
I wasn’t simply washing fabric. I was repeatedly exposing polymeric materials to water, detergent, mechanical stress, heat, etc. Every wash is, in a small way, an interaction between chemistry and materials science.
The next time I put my nylon-elastane leggings and tops, I know I’ll probably just think “this is so damn soft” but now I also know that softenss isn’t just a property I can feel. It is the macroscopic consequence of molecular architecture, intermolecular interactions, polymer morphology, fiber processing and fiber construction-all happening at scales I cannot see.
That’s perhaps what I love about chemistry. It makes ordinary impossible to look at in quite the same way.
