Profile pic

Section Ratio General, ratio_tile@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Instance: lemmy.blahaj.zone
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 16
Comments: 39

We must ruin the west!

  • Particularly Reach the Master

RSS feed

Posts and Comments by Section Ratio General, ratio_tile@lemmy.blahaj.zone



Man, I miss Don Knotts.

Although, I feel like Steve Buschemi + Jim Carry should be an isomorphism of the identity of these set transformations. Like how turning an object 180° twice gives the same result as doing nothing.




I reflexively hit skip before I even finished processing that i was looking at a meme. Now I’m horrified at how these have classically conditioned me to do them without thinking.


This is preemptive, sort of.

There’s been an ongoing edit war going on over the captions of the picture which is a spillover from the page for Guy Standing which features a picture of Standing sitting since there are no pictures of Guy Standing standing. The obvious joke was made almost immediately, which was reverted almost immediately. Normally this is where things would have stayed, but the joke about Guy sitting became a sort of political issue as I described in this post. Wikipedia has been trying to be more serious for a while now, and stuff similar to the Cetaceon Needed joke is not being allowed to stay even though they don’t violate the rules of the site.

When the Guy Standing caption was fully lost ground due to ruling by the admin team, the edit/reversion war moved to the page for Sir Guy Standing, starting with a picture of Sir Standing sitting in center-frame with his daughter behind him (necessitating the clarification that Standing is sitting). This picture makes the clarification less relevant and is therefore more vulnerable to being relabeled as Standing (left).

I would have not learned about Prof. Standing’s theory on the precariat class if it wasn’t for this joke. I also would not have learned about Sir Standing’s film career if it wasn’t for this joke. Removing the frankly nondisruptive jokes about how Standing is sitting, in the opinion of myself and many others, harms the educational mission of Wikipedia.


As a daycare teacher, this is an accurate representation of a child


That’s not the Buddha, thats the Budai, you illiterate fuck

(Speaking to the author, not you)


I’ve actually met a lot of gays who never got the talk. Guess their parents never thought they needed it.




Honestly same. If someone breaks my trust, they’re all but dead to me. Becoming a nazi is one of those things that breaks my trust.

Don’t get me wrong, they can get better and work on themselves and I’ll treat them with respect because all humans deserve respect. But it will take a long, long time before I trust them again. 



RSS feed

Posts by Section Ratio General, ratio_tile@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Comments by Section Ratio General, ratio_tile@lemmy.blahaj.zone



Man, I miss Don Knotts.

Although, I feel like Steve Buschemi + Jim Carry should be an isomorphism of the identity of these set transformations. Like how turning an object 180° twice gives the same result as doing nothing.




I reflexively hit skip before I even finished processing that i was looking at a meme. Now I’m horrified at how these have classically conditioned me to do them without thinking.


This is preemptive, sort of.

There’s been an ongoing edit war going on over the captions of the picture which is a spillover from the page for Guy Standing which features a picture of Standing sitting since there are no pictures of Guy Standing standing. The obvious joke was made almost immediately, which was reverted almost immediately. Normally this is where things would have stayed, but the joke about Guy sitting became a sort of political issue as I described in this post. Wikipedia has been trying to be more serious for a while now, and stuff similar to the Cetaceon Needed joke is not being allowed to stay even though they don’t violate the rules of the site.

When the Guy Standing caption was fully lost ground due to ruling by the admin team, the edit/reversion war moved to the page for Sir Guy Standing, starting with a picture of Sir Standing sitting in center-frame with his daughter behind him (necessitating the clarification that Standing is sitting). This picture makes the clarification less relevant and is therefore more vulnerable to being relabeled as Standing (left).

I would have not learned about Prof. Standing’s theory on the precariat class if it wasn’t for this joke. I also would not have learned about Sir Standing’s film career if it wasn’t for this joke. Removing the frankly nondisruptive jokes about how Standing is sitting, in the opinion of myself and many others, harms the educational mission of Wikipedia.


As a daycare teacher, this is an accurate representation of a child


That’s not the Buddha, thats the Budai, you illiterate fuck

(Speaking to the author, not you)


I’ve actually met a lot of gays who never got the talk. Guess their parents never thought they needed it.




Honestly same. If someone breaks my trust, they’re all but dead to me. Becoming a nazi is one of those things that breaks my trust.

Don’t get me wrong, they can get better and work on themselves and I’ll treat them with respect because all humans deserve respect. But it will take a long, long time before I trust them again. 




Well, sometimes gender fucks with the data because we live in a society and all that. Gotta at least try to compensate for likely sources of error


I do think a rainbow table would be welcome in Elementary Ed


I am still curious what the lesbian version of a bear or otter would be. I dont think butch covers it