hperrin, hperrin@lemmy.ca

It is though. If you commit copyrighted code that was generated by an LLM, you do have to follow the license of that code. If you don’t, that’s copyright infringement.

Even if the code isn’t copyrighted code, then it’s public domain code that can’t be copyrighted:

https://sciactive.com/human-contribution-policy/#More-Information

According to the US Copyright Office, AI generated material cannot be copyrighted (unless of course it’s plagiarized copyrighted code). That’s reason enough to leave it out of the kernel. If the kernel’s license becomes unenforceable because of public domain code, the kernel is tainted.

You don’t need AI to autocomplete code. We’ve had autocomplete for over 30 years.

No, it’s not a reasonable approach. Make people be the authors of the code they submit is reasonable, because then it can be released under the GPL. AI generated code is public domain.

This is a bad move. The GPL license cannot be enforced on AI generated code.

No, it is real pork and real ham. It’s mostly the shoulder cuts, but there’s still real ham in there.

Pork, ham, and salt, mostly. So it is spiced ham if you consider salt a spice (it’s not).

Who’s Jo Bloss?

I edited my comment and added a couple more points beyond that one. (Sorry, I know editing comments like that is bad etiquette.)

Sure someone can learn techniques and stuff, but if their genitals and/or naked body are not sexually attractive to you, or vice versa, that’s something that’s better to find out before getting the government involved.

Or if the things that turn you on turn him off or vice versa, that’s also something that’s better to know early.

So it’s not really about “bad” in bed. It’s whether what they like to do is something that satisfies you sexually, and whether what you like to do is something that satisfies them sexually.

I don’t know if that’s reasonable. If you’re only saying that to “filter out” people, then you’re going to filter out good people. But if a guy is being too pushy when you say you want to wait, you don’t need to lie about waiting for marriage to test him, just break it off because he’s being pushy.

Or if the things that turn you on turn him off or vice versa, that’s also something that’s better to know early.

You have to think of the potential that this person is not going to be able to please you sexually. If that’s something you’re cool with in a marriage, then yeah, that’s fine.

Speaking personally, that’s not something I would want to risk.

Valid. You need to know if it’s a sometimes bug or an always bug.

Oof.

Even if I cared, I still wouldn’t care.

* world’s tiniest violin *

This is so intensely cringe.

A comment that probably should be posted on the HN page, but is posted here instead.

I hit my head on the pavement bicycling drunk while my helmet was sitting on my desk at work. Ask me how fun the two weeks after that concussion was.

They also love fondly remembering their friend Little Stevie who tragically died aged 12 in 1957 in a helmet-less bicycle accident.