Nord.pubSusanoStyle, susanostyle@lemmy.ml
Instance: lemmy.ml
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 2
Comments: 7
Posts and Comments by SusanoStyle, susanostyle@lemmy.ml
c/selfhosted
c/selfhostComments by SusanoStyle, susanostyle@lemmy.ml
LinuxA bit off topic but i used to had a fiber provider which on rainy days internet would intermittently go down. I think the outside terminal was exposed or something. Also between 2AM and 6AM internet would start dropping packets like crazy.
I see, i will study it over the weekend a bit better and see what i end up doing. Thank you.
I’m leaning towards it, i will probably bit the bullet. Thanks for your comment.
I did, but i don’t know if changing things there will cause conflicts.
Since i have no experience using luci i don’t know what behaviour is normal or expected, and to what extent the custom software glinet uses changes it. Do you think that tweeking the preconfigured networks would cause conflicts in the long run?
After sleeping over it, im leaning towards going full vanilla. It should be easier to find tutorials to solve and isolate problems.
Anyways thanks for your comment.
Glad to hear it! My pleasure, always happy to learn.
Fair enough, now i feel a bit ashamed since you are way way more knowledgeable than me. I have only been a Debian user for a year and half.
I made the reply because i remember that when i was looking to enter into Linux, Debian testing was recommended as a great compromise between stable and unstable.
My surprise when i went to the Debian wiki and said, pretty ambiguously at that, that i shouldn’t use it! Reason being that it wasn’t as updated in security patches as stable. No one told me that bit when i was asking. Since i didn’t know the risks involved, i took the safe option and went with stable, in the end loved it.
I have to admit that for your case it makes sense to use it. You know the risks, know where to patch it up, and it helps to contribute to it by testing it and submitting bugs. Thank you!
I do still think that testing shouldn’t be recommended, but i see and agree that it has it’s niche where it works and can be great for some people.
Anyways, i hope i didn’t came too hostile in my first reply! Cheers
I disagree, the strong points of debian are the stability (long periods of testing, without new changes) and security (by applying security updates quickly).
Using testing or sid means to forego the strong points. At that point you are better served by other distros which focus on having newer packages.
Also i would be cautious about using Debian testing (forky).As far as i know its the worst in terms of security. Stable has security update priority over testing. And some people say even sid it’s better on that front by having even newer packages.
Disclaimer: I daily drive debian stable and game on it without hiccups. Rock solid. BUT i have 7 year old amd rig and the games are not demanding.
A bit off topic but i used to had a fiber provider which on rainy days internet would intermittently go down. I think the outside terminal was exposed or something. Also between 2AM and 6AM internet would start dropping packets like crazy.
I see, i will study it over the weekend a bit better and see what i end up doing. Thank you.
I’m leaning towards it, i will probably bit the bullet. Thanks for your comment.
I did, but i don’t know if changing things there will cause conflicts.
Since i have no experience using luci i don’t know what behaviour is normal or expected, and to what extent the custom software glinet uses changes it. Do you think that tweeking the preconfigured networks would cause conflicts in the long run?
After sleeping over it, im leaning towards going full vanilla. It should be easier to find tutorials to solve and isolate problems.
Anyways thanks for your comment.
[Help] [Questions] About Gl-MT3000, AdguardHome and Openwrt
Hi there, i have a few questions about GL-Mt3000 and Openwrt.
[Help] [Questions] About Gl-MT3000, AdguardHome and Openwrt
Hi there, i have a few questions about GL-Mt3000 and Openwrt.
Glad to hear it! My pleasure, always happy to learn.
Fair enough, now i feel a bit ashamed since you are way way more knowledgeable than me. I have only been a Debian user for a year and half.
I made the reply because i remember that when i was looking to enter into Linux, Debian testing was recommended as a great compromise between stable and unstable.
My surprise when i went to the Debian wiki and said, pretty ambiguously at that, that i shouldn’t use it! Reason being that it wasn’t as updated in security patches as stable. No one told me that bit when i was asking. Since i didn’t know the risks involved, i took the safe option and went with stable, in the end loved it.
I have to admit that for your case it makes sense to use it. You know the risks, know where to patch it up, and it helps to contribute to it by testing it and submitting bugs. Thank you!
I do still think that testing shouldn’t be recommended, but i see and agree that it has it’s niche where it works and can be great for some people.
Anyways, i hope i didn’t came too hostile in my first reply! Cheers
I disagree, the strong points of debian are the stability (long periods of testing, without new changes) and security (by applying security updates quickly).
Using testing or sid means to forego the strong points. At that point you are better served by other distros which focus on having newer packages.
Also i would be cautious about using Debian testing (forky).As far as i know its the worst in terms of security. Stable has security update priority over testing. And some people say even sid it’s better on that front by having even newer packages.
Disclaimer: I daily drive debian stable and game on it without hiccups. Rock solid. BUT i have 7 year old amd rig and the games are not demanding.