ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 9 个月前Inheritancelemmy.curiana.netimagemessage-square36linkfedilinkarrow-up11.29Karrow-down15
arrow-up11.29Karrow-down1imageInheritancelemmy.curiana.netExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 9 个月前message-square36linkfedilink
minus-squarebitchkat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·9 个月前For some reason, COBOL has had OOP features since 2002.
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·9 个月前 For some reason It’s because “every language must do OOP”. Every SQL engine does it… SWI Prolog seems to have escaped, but COBOL had no chance.
For some reason, COBOL has had OOP features since 2002.
It’s because “every language must do OOP”.
Every SQL engine does it… SWI Prolog seems to have escaped, but COBOL had no chance.