• Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I enjoy my small shitbox (2007 KIA Rio5 hatchback) and wish I had a smaller shitbox to commute in

    One of the biggest perks is the fact that my little shitbox is FIXABLE by sane people with standard tools! No special tools, parts are literally everywhere, and all the parts are DIRT CHEAP. The engine is in Hyundais and KIAs from 1989 to 2011. If it’s a 1.6L 4 cylinder made by those 2 companies it’s the same engine between ALL OF THEM.

  • fireweed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    In a surprising reversal, the meme got it right (SUVs, 90s) and the title did not (SUV’s).

    Even when dealing with acronyms and numbers, " 's " indicates possession.

  • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    You’ll never convince me that SUVs don’t exist solely to sell what is effectively a minivan to deeply insecure men.

    • ViaGetty (fae/faer/faers)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Deeply insecure men buy pickup trucks with hoods I can barely see over. SUVs and their perception of “safety”, storage space, and ride height are why women are the primary purchasers.

  • Tottakai@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Oh, that Ford Escort model was truly Fix Or Repair Daily.

    God, how bad it was. The shittiest and most unreliable car I ever had.

    • Pipster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      My grandad had one, a 1.4 “Eclipse”. Granted he was a mechanic and very handy at fixing his own cars but that thing was super reliable. Now the Orion he got it to replace was another story, utterly useless hunk of crap. Technically the same car but still…

  • Justin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 hours ago

    My contribution - 1990 Volkswagen Vanagon. It is pretty large, but hilariously it’s still smaller than a Chevy Tahoe lol.

    A 1990 Volkswagen Vanagon painted white with stripes in the colors of the German flag running down the sides

  • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I mean, it might be small but it got worse gas mileage, was heavier and would kill you in a fender Bender.

    • paul@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Turning a corner was like opening a submarine hatch. The brakes locked up causing more accidents and deaths. The suspension allowed the cars to roll easier. And if you were hit by one of them, you had a much higher chance of severe injury or death due to the lack of crumple zone.

      People really need to stop looking for solutions to modern problems by looking to the past at the things that were the reason we ended up with the modern problems.

      • rapchee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        you’re thinking 60s maybe, 90s cars had servos, crumple zones, even abs and tcs. maybe not the bottom tier ones, but it was def available
        i was skimming the wiki page for crumple zone and they had simulations for the '86 vw polo
        you’re prolly right on the fuel efficiency though

  • Kekzkrieger@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Here just aren’t any smaller cars to purchase anymore, there are a few french ones but thats basically it. Like please make decent sized cars that drive electric.

    • pedz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      59 minutes ago

      Smaller cars will continue to kill a few billion animals yearly. They will also continue to kill around a million of humans every year, or about one human every 30 seconds.

      The area covered by parking lots is mostly impervious and contributes to flooding as well as heat islands. Cars and parking lots make cities hotter and are worsening climate change. They also contribute to noise pollution. And no, electric cars are not better for noise because at highway speed they are as noisy as fossil fuel cars, and at low speed, their pedestrian warning system is also louder than fossil fuel cars.

      I can be nuanced and understand that some people will always need a car, but most people in the world live in a town, a suburb, or a city, and the existence of the vast majority of those cars cannot be justified, whatever their size. Of course smaller cars are desirable. Electric cars are desirable A mix of electric and smaller would be better than status quo. But fewer cars is even more desirable.

      • teuniac_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        45 minutes ago

        The ugliest urban environments were designed around older cars, long before SUVs were the norm. Like you said, it’s not just the car, but also the infrastructure it requires.

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Cars wouldn’t be so bad if they weren’t so oversized

      And if there weren’t so many of them.

        • PumpUpTheJam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          And if Americans could drive. Majority limply hold the steering wheel with one hand, more concerned with looking cool than being in control of their 5 ton truck of entitlement.

      • wpb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        And if they didn’t pollute so much

        Edit: oh and the traffic accidents of course! But aside from their size, the required infrastructure, their number, the pollution, and the traffic accidents, cars are totally fine!

        Edit 2: And the noise! But other than those things…

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      “Fuck cars”, like “ACAB”, is often a quick tagline to a problem people understand is more nuanced. I don’t think so many people here would literally like all cars in existence to be crushed in a heap.

      • pedz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        50 minutes ago

        I left reddit because I was apparently too anti car for /r/fuckcars. If this community becomes like the reddit diluted sub where people were making car apology and justifying their use, I’m going to be very disappointed.

        I would really love that all cars in existence be crushed into a heap. It’s a fantasy and I know it won’t happen. I can compromise. But if most could be crushed in a heap, that would be very great too.

      • prenatal_confusion@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Literally most though. And I agree.

        Public transport is the way to go.

        Exceptions for delivery and trucks for construction, emergency services etc.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’d like that. Take however much chaos or inefficiency you think that day would cause, now imagine centuries of climate change.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Cars also have become bigger because of safety standards and regulations. Like even small cars like a Volkswagen Polo have become larger than their 80’s/90’s counterparts while the interior space didn’t increase that much.

      • ___@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 minutes ago

        That doesn’t explain ever expanding legroom and cabin space though. Why is every new generation of car an inch larger in each direction? The human body isn’t on average getting taller at anywhere near the scale that cars are (though maybe we are getting a bit wider…)

      • 31ank@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Mazda MX-5/Miata current generation is about the same size (i think 5cm or so longer) as the original with modern safety features, it’s possible to keep the footprint small

      • prenatal_confusion@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Still they could be smaller than they are now even with higher security requirements. Almost nobody needs a jeep, suv and van. Get some small cars that meet your requirements (besides compensating your erectile disfunction).

  • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Can’t find it right now, but this reminds me of that one video about the Citroën C15 (or a similar car) basically asking “Do you really need a car bigger than this?” and showing off how the C15 can transport multiple cows and go cross country and such.

    • Gathorall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Minivans/MPVs are so much better family cars in practice it isn’t even funny.

      They are comfier. Less ground clearance drives better and is more economical. They are actually effective at occasional cargo hauling. And so on. Luckily they seem on the uptick, SUVs are a devolution in practical aspects.