The US delivers “freedom” to any country in the region that tries to stand up to israel.

Liberalism is inherently allied to fascism. Both ideologies worship profit and property ownership so have a vested interest in opposing socialism and class struggle.

Netanyahu & co chat shit about Jesus. Only natural for their US employees to do the same.

They’ve “lost” about 20 of them since their illegal, perfidious attack on Iran. They really should be more careful.

Law school

“As long as men die liberty will never perish”

• Charlie Chaplin.

God bless you for helping the neurospicy.

Harris was just another AIPAC cutout.

Whoever you vote for in the US you get Netanyahu and his Zionist billionaire lobby machine.

And Israel. They have an apocalyptic vision of the region and have no issue with genocide. They also have over a hundred nuclear weapons and never signed the Non Proliferation Treaty.

Youre right but in the interview he made out like he was able to blend in with his Arabic.

Also if he was a real whistleblower I’m sure he’d have had a car accident or tragic mugging gone wrong or suicide by now.

He said he’s fluent in Arabic and thats how he befriended and turned an al Qaeda guy in Pakistan but I heard him speak Arabic and its lousy and he would stand out as a foreigner a mile away.

Tried it. doesn’t work.

Why would the US undermine its own ceasefire by green lighting Israel to commit massacres against civilians in Lebanon?

Its makes more sense to see it as Israel wanting to dragg the US back into its war

Now that I think about it maybe the US did greenlight the massacres to embarrass Iran and show them to be weak and unable to respond to Zionist provocations. That makes sense as well.

I’m confused.

Performative stunt from an AIPAC puppet

Operation Epic Filing

deleted by creator

Zionists hate her because she supports justice for Palestinians rather than staying silent

I’ve read Schelling’s Strategy of Conflict so I have done some reading on this. Once again you are assuming players are always rational which is a simplistic assumption. The game doesn’t work if one side doesn’t care about iterative rounds, chooses to signal erratic behaviour or doesn’t understand the implications of their actions.

A good example is Nixon’s “madman theory” during the Vietnam conflict.

Trump is erratic and can’t be assumed to act rationally , so his use of a nuclear weapon would massively increase the chance that Russia would use one in response on the basis that the US is willing to kill the leaders of other countries in a sneak attack.

MAD is not set in stone and can break down in certain circumstances.

Calling out the Fourth Estate for its role in enforcing status quo narratives makes you paranoid, apparently.