Are you seriously looking at this slop and thinking anybody was giving it a deeper consideration than ‘haha fuck yeah, badass’. I refuse to believe they’re thinking any more about the symbolism of the skull with the glowing eyes than they’re thinking about the symbolism of the explosion.

The only fascist part of the imagery is the border team names on the chests. Or just generally the celebration of their mission. The skull is possibly the least fascist thing on the coin.

‘just like the totenkopf’ except not at all. They’re nazis because of the nazi shit they do not because somebody made a challenge coin with an extremely basic toughguy badass tacticool motif.

Skulls have been common imagery for literally centuries, I do not understand this weird trend in the last few years where some people have decided that they’re exclusively a fascist symbol.

*Also the absurdity here of pointing at the brownshirts and going ‘umm, that imagery is a bit problematic.’

Yeah imagine giving a shit something this inconsequential. Oh no some chuds made a challenge coin in bog standard tacticool aesthetic.

I think people are vastly overestimating the amount of rinsing required for a shower. Scrubbing with soapy water is like 99.9% of the shower. You don’t need a constant hose blast of fresh water to have enough water to do that and actually is probably removing the soap too early.

To answer the question, away because I’m not a sicko. But obviously turning to rinse when needed.

Dumb top reply considering all of their complaints are about stuff that is not contained to the neighbors property, except the google fiber thing which is just bizarre.

As soon as you’re making other people smell or hear something you’re making it their business.

All noise pollution defenders deserve to never hear their own choice of music without someone else’s bassline cutting through it.

“nothing interesting going on in Afghanistan”

“no obligation to any sympathizers or collaborators there”

“letting 3 people flood our country”

Touch some grass if you’re so used to strawmen that this isn’t immediately obvious as sarcasm.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

I assumed they were saying he chickened out of today’s deadline to open the strait. Which doesn’t make sense because Iran agreed to that specific demand. I did not consider that maybe they were calling him a coward for not doubling down and continuing the war.

Sure I guess you can call him a coward for not doubling down and not technically be wrong. Wouldn’t occur to me to do that though.

Sorry I thought “trump is a coward for not doubling down and doing a ground invasion” was too stupid of a position to take. I assumed they were saying he chickened out of today’s deadline to open the strait.

consider at least reading the headline of the post you’re commenting on

*“agrees” heavily implies two parties. CNN is not such a clickbait rag that they would have framed it like that with a looming deadline less than 2 hours away if it was just trump saying some shit unilaterally.

Ok, it’ll make sense to say XD TACO if they reneg and Trump doesn’t follow through. But they’ve agreed to open the strait or there is no ceasefire agreement.

The demand was open the strait or get bombed, they agreed to open the strait as a condition of the ceasefire.

This is like getting mugged, handing over your wallet, and then saying ‘hah, I knew you were too much of a coward to stab me.’

I know you guys really love your twee little catchphrase but how did he chicken out when his demands were met? Iran are the ones who folded, at least for now.

**oh nevermind, Iran is saying he agreed to their 10 point plan. If that’s true then lmao, the whole civilization ending thing was probably staged to let him save some face.

***if it’s not in reference specifically to today’s deadline to open the strait then the subtext of saying TACO here is that you’re calling him a coward for not continuing the war. weird take but ok.

If you can’t figure that out on your own then you probably shouldn’t bet on it.

Why are you demanding that leftists compromise and support the genocide instead of demanding that the DNC compromise? Am I supposed to read that as anything other than you support the genocide? You love genocide so much that it was worth putting trump into office to make sure that it happened?

Why are you demanding that leftists compromise and support the genocide instead of demanding that the DNC compromise? Am I supposed to read that as anything other than you support the genocide? You love genocide so much that it was worth putting trump into office to make sure that it happened?

Lemmy is about 10000% less facebook normie. I don’t care if it’s the same amount of toxic, that’s already a massive improvement.

It’s not bitcoin. It’s a real material that you can use for stuff.

“unrealistic ideals” of a non-genocidal candidate.

I didn’t have one dumbass. The only viable candidates had the same stance on the genocide.

It just means you prefer failure over compromise.

What like Kamala? The person who had infinitely more power to not put Trump into power than I did?

Why are you demanding that leftists compromise and support the genocide instead of demanding that the DNC compromise? Am I supposed to read that as anything other than you support the genocide? You love genocide so much that it was worth putting trump into office to make sure that it happened?

to repeat myself again

I would have maybe a single ounce of sympathy for the lib side of this argument if the stakes were lower. ‘You don’t always get everything you want’ is a hell of a lot more convincing if the left had refused to play ball over healthcare reform or something. But jesus christ ‘don’t do genocide’ is the lowest possible bar to clear and Kamala still refused.