Currently submitted to: JMIR Human Factors
Date Submitted: Feb 19, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 25, 2025 - May 20, 2025
(currently open for review)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Clinician perceptions of a novel multicomponent digital Care Assistant and support Program for people after Stroke or transient ischaemic attack (CAPS) for secondary prevention of stroke: a qualitative study
ABSTRACT
Background:
We co-designed a novel multicomponent Care Assistant and support Program for people after Stroke or transient ischaemic attack (CAPS) to augment secondary prevention of stroke.
Objective:
Following completion of a feasibility study, we sought feedback from Australian clinicians and service provider representatives (the potential deliverers of CAPS) regarding their perceptions of CAPS for secondary prevention, and pathways to real-world adoption.
Methods:
Qualitative descriptive study of clinicians and service provider representatives involved in delivery of stroke care around Australia. A pragmatic convenience sample was obtained from previous CAPS co-design study participants, leveraging professional networks (e.g., LinkedIn), and distributing study flyers and newsletters via Primary Healthcare Networks, General Practitioner (GP) networks, and social media posts (CSIRO LinkedIn pages). Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted virtually with clinicians and representatives of the Stroke Foundation (Australia). Data were thematically analysed using an integrated approach.
Results:
Three Stroke Foundation representatives and eighteen clinicians participated, from five Australian states, including medical specialists, GPs, nurses, and allied health professionals. We collected their perceptions of CAPS, including potential benefits of the program for secondary prevention, and considerations for facilitators and challenges to real-world program implementation. Discussion regarding the perceived benefits focussed more on the benefits to patients than to clinicians. Program implementation sub-themes included program initiation and duration, patient support considerations; and workflow alignment, which included consideration of barriers and enablers to uptake within primary care practice and Stroke Foundation outreach support programs.
Conclusions:
There was support from participants for the potential of CAPS to improve secondary prevention of stroke. However, addressing the challenges raised by participants including further implementation and integration considerations, such as sustainability of the model of care, are likely required for CAPS to be successfully embedded within clinical settings.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.