Currently submitted to: JMIR Aging
Date Submitted: Mar 26, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 8, 2025 - Jun 3, 2025
(currently open for review and needs more reviewers - can you help?)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Technology for healthy ageing: Selection, optimisation and compensation strategies used by older adults to live well with technology
ABSTRACT
Background:
With rapid digitalisation, technologies are increasingly integrated as part of our everyday lives, and are becoming increasingly essential for individuals to participate in society. Technology presents opportunities to support healthy ageing, however the processes in which older adults select and integrate technologies into their daily live has not been well examined.
Objective:
This study uses the Selection, Optimisation and Compensation (SOC) Model to understand how older adults integrate technology into their everyday lives to live well. The two key research questions are as follows: 1.How do older adults describe their technology use and their choices, analysed with respect to SOC processes? 2. How do older adults perceive that technology is a part of living well?
Methods:
A descriptive qualitative study was conducted. Purposive sampling was used to recruit older adults who were aged 55 and above, living in the community, who speak and understand English, and resided in Australia. Five focus groups comprising 20 older adults were conducted. Data were analysed using hybrid inductive and deductive reflexive thematic analysis, based on the SOC Model
Results:
Older adults selected technology intentionally to enhance different aspects of their daily lives. Perceived ‘involuntary’ selection of technology could lead to feelings of resentment or frustration. Optimisation strategies included self-monitoring, integrating technology into daily routines, digital literacy and proficiency, and problem-solving skills. Compensatory strategies included choosing alternative technology that suited participants’ abilities or skills, and seeking support through informal or formal avenues.
Conclusions:
These findings provide important considerations for technology developers to design technology in collaboration with older adults to ensure that they align with needs and preferences. Digital literacy is not sufficient to empower older adults to use technology; when empowering older adults to use technology, service providers should also consider facilitating other intrinsic and extrinsic resources and skills. Clinical Trial: Not applicable.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.