• PugJesus@piefed.socialOPMEnglish
    34·
    2 months ago

    Explanation: During the Rwandan Genocide in the 1990s, a UN peacekeeping force was actually stationed in the country, and tasked with… well, keeping the peace.

    … but given no power to do so. The leaders of the force itself pleaded for a wider mandate to be granted by the UN Security Council, so they could actually do something to protect refugees from genocide, but only New Zealand went to bat for them. Their rules of engagement - the conditions under which soldiers are allowed to actually fire on the enemy - were so restrictive that there were incidents where UN troops were killed by enemy fire and still not allowed to fire back. For obvious reasons, the Tutsis, who were being genocided, thus did not fare much better under UN ‘protection’ than without it.

    It is widely considered one of the UN’s biggest failures.

    • Mirshe@lemmy.world
      18·
      2 months ago

      The French, I think, literally handed over a diplomat’s wife and children to be killed in front of the entire convoy AT THE AIRSTRIP.

      • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPMEnglish
        6·
        2 months ago

        Jesus fucking Christ. Hadn’t heard that before, and I can’t confirm or deny it since my knowledge of the genocide is rather sparse, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it is true, given all the other fuckery that went on.

        • Mirshe@lemmy.world
          9·
          2 months ago

          Lions Led By Donkeys did a well-researched 4-part podcast on the Rwandan genocide, I highly recommend it.

    • ohulancutash@feddit.ukEnglish
      7·
      2 months ago

      The head of UN Peacekeeping Operations at the time was Kofi Annan, who regularly ignored communications from his commanders and refused to make any decisions which could harm his way to the top spot.

  • teslasaur@lemmy.world
    11·
    2 months ago

    Lets be honest. If they had intervened, we would sit here and taking the piss out of the U.N. for using force during a peace-mission. Can’t win.

    • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPMEnglish
      14·
      2 months ago

      Maybe, but a PR loss and more lives saved is better to my eyes than a PR loss and more lives lost. And God knows I’ve never minded defending idealistic historical failures. :p

  • NutellaIs4Lvrs@lemmy.world
    10·
    2 months ago

    This is a fairly decent book I read from the perspective of the guy put in charge: “Shake Hands with the Devil: The Failure of Humanity in Rwanda” by General Romeo Dallaire. Basically was given nothing until it was well too late and then told to accomplish peace with nothing.