Sillan alla on tilaa meille kaikille

  • 1 Post
  • 142 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: May 18th, 2025

help-circle

  • would have been dangerous for him to suggest that God isn’t real at the time

    This is just a personal opinion, but I think you can really see this in a lot of the western philosophers from the past centuries. A lot of the texts and ideas read like tiptoeing around it, like “haha yeah… sure god is real! despite all these things I’m saying that might suggest otherwise… but of course he’s real and these ideas actually support the conclusion! really!”



  • My suggestion is always “suicide clinics”, where you can just walk in. That sounds absolutely horrid, but the point is to catch the people that can be saved by intervention. They take you in, and talk with you, go through medical history, then you have to wait some hours etc. and all that. And if you still wish to die and you’re not diagnosed with having some sort of episode, they just let you swallow some pills and then you get to lay on a bed and die.

    That’d be way more efficient than just letting people jump from the rooftops and on the train tracks, would save people, would traumatize less people, would cause less suffering; would overall improve the situation. Of course that could be misused, and it would not catch all people. But I’d definitely prioritize getting less people splatter on the sidewalk anyway







  • I’ve never done any drugs (trauma from witnessing alcohol use as a child), but once I had a dream where I just suddenly died for a short moment without any connection to the dream I was having. Like, literally died, there was nothing, I just disappeared for a blink. Absolutely gone. I strongly believe had I not come back I would have just died in my sleep. I’ve never had that experience before or since, and it’s really hard to describe since you can’t really feel death, but that reminded me of it


  • Might also have something to do with many of us burgers tending to have a really strong sense of justice. Pointed at right direction that’s a powerful motivator to go against all perceived wrongs, in the autistic lacking self regulation way. Which can be quite extreme


  • Tonava@sopuli.xyztoScience Memes@mander.xyzA shrubbery!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Oh for sure, I made a very broad generalization there, to simplify the point. Just someone trying to live ethically and using only local products, but eating meat (hunted, organic, etc. locally small scale, animal suffering minimized and all that) could very well have a lesser ecological impact than someone being vegan but relying on imported soy etc. In my experience vegans are just the most likely to even think about this stuff since veganism usually goes further than just being about a diet, but that doesn’t mean all vegans do, or that a lot of non-vegans don’t.

    And having the possibility to choose options based only on ethics and sustainability of course is a privilege a lot of people just don’t have



  • Thanks for the explanation, that makes a lot more sense. I guess the two sides fighting -discourse just tends to dominate platforms like these online, which doesn’t exactly make people more patient either… Hopefully these aggressive online vibes don’t discourage too many people from taking part on the lower levels, since that really is the only real way to fix things (instead of fully breaking them)


  • Tonava@sopuli.xyztoScience Memes@mander.xyzA shrubbery!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Also just supporting bad agriculture in general, since pesticides kill crazy amounts of stuff, deforestation, giant monoculture fields suffocating native wildlife, producing the fertilizers unethically, transporting stuff half across the world needlessly… if you do anything the “optimize profits” -way things get shitty. All of these things apply to plant based diets as well, but vegans often focus on the whole chain of ethical and ecological problems whereas vegetarians tend to focus more to the personal level of things. So even what plant products they buy and consume might have some big differences in ecological impact and ethical concerns



  • I’m just a random outsider and this is besides the topic I guess - but what’s with this focus on voting only I keep seeing? You need to affect the candidates so you don’t have to choose between evils in the voting booth. Or is it impossible and USAs system so incurably busted already that only luiging all the people in power would work? But why argue only about voting in either case




  • It could be argued that morality is a human construct and therefore must be subjective.

    You can also jump straight to the top and argue it’s because the human experience itself is always subjective, since meat doesn’t seem to be very good at observing Reality. And then we get to cogito ergo sum and all that jazz