would have been dangerous for him to suggest that God isn’t real at the time
This is just a personal opinion, but I think you can really see this in a lot of the western philosophers from the past centuries. A lot of the texts and ideas read like tiptoeing around it, like “haha yeah… sure god is real! despite all these things I’m saying that might suggest otherwise… but of course he’s real and these ideas actually support the conclusion! really!”












The consistency isn’t really the selling point, yeah. What made the books any good was the kind of whimsy of being suddenly thrown into a weird magical word that didn’t follow any understandable logic and was full of cool stuff and mysteries. That’s a great hook for kids! The first three books do that pretty well. After that…