An easy strawman to make. Assuming Democrats and Republicans are 100% identical on foreign policy, why would Democrats not be the clear superior if only because they don’t cause needless suffering to interior minorities? Seems like you’re the one that doesn’t consider them to be people, their suffering is acceptable because America bad.

Yeah mhmm, I’m the one trolling

Lol. What happened to pragmatic harm reduction?

Nothing happened, I don’t understand your confusion.

You were perfectly happy to disregard the suffering caused to the victims of American imperialism…

Where have I disregarded it?

But of course, you don’t actually consider them people

methinks you’re projecting, you are the one that seems happy to cause suffering as long as it fits your ideals

which is why you can suddenly do a complete 180 on your previous stance without even thinking about it when white people might be the ones to suffer.

Please demonstrate the 180, I believe I’ve been quite consistent.

No, the person that would choose to let the Nazis kill an extra million Jews is a Nazi.

Why?

Who’s they??? I’m not talking about Democrat campaign promises, I’m talking about the measurable impact of things that happened since Trump’s second term. That much more suffering could have been avoided.

What is BlueMAGA then?

They’re not worse, the lives of marginalized groups are markedly worse since the start of Trump’s second term. Do those lives not matter?

That’s an incredible disregard for human suffering. Those that would let a million more Jews die when they have the ability to save lives and suffering are more Nazi, in my opinion.

I know, right? Some people wouldn’t lift a finger to save 1%, truly disgusting people live among us

They are the exact same party

Except they clearly aren’t, if you cannot recognize that Democrats are literally not as bad as Republicans, you’re living outside reality.

Yes, simple as

do you not listen to yourself

I mean, you clearly didn’t

It is not worth voting for Democrat because you are still giving into the system and enabling genocide and exploitation

Why is giving into the system, in order of SOME less suffering, not an option?

You haven’t demonstrated why I shouldn’t favor the person that doesn’t beat a man to death

Imagine if words had meaning.

I know, right.

And that would have been a better outcome, one less megadeath is a huge success.

Because it just means “someone I disagree with?” Sure

The harm reduction choice is the one that causes the US to collapse the fastest

That’s accelerationism and shows disregard for the suffering it will cause.