I’m kind of sick of being a dev. I hate AI with a passion.

I hate the hallucinations, I hate slop, I hate megacrops, I hate the environmental impacts, I hate the massive costs. I could go on but you get the picture.

At work I often times have to review vibe code slop from people who clock in 9 to 5 and don’t give a fuck (I respect that, I just wish your fucking code wasn’t slop)

I’m sick of it, I’m sick of hearing about AI tooling or new models or bro agentic actions bro based on your documentation bro.

I want to switch careers, so which career is not ruined by AI?

  • Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    1 month ago

    Join us, become a tradie. Get a company vehicle. Work with your hands. Become enough of an expert in your trade that you can tell customers to go fuck themselves if they’re dicks. Have every company in the area be desperate to hire you because every trade is short handed. Work with people who barely understand the concept of a computer. Spend half of every paycheck on milwalkee packout tool boxes. Never have to work with AI again.

    My preference is HVAC-R but plumber or electrician are also good choices. Building automation may seem attractive but then you’re getting close to the AI danger zone again.

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 month ago

      Ironically, the three trades you listed are in high demand right now specifically because of the rapid rollout of the data centers needed to power AI.

    • ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      A couple of thoughts on this as a union electrician: for starters AI is absolutely having an (arguably negative) impact on manpower fulfillment. In my area the massive expansion of data centers is causing a manpower shortage for all projects not funded by massive tech companies. This is complicated because it’s inflating income for tradesmen due to demand, but it’s also pressuring workers into ridiculous schedules (think 4x10s, 2x8s, and most Sundays) and is forcing contractors that aren’t running data center work to completely rework their payment structure and bid practices. Many of these sites are also a 1-2 hour commute for a large number of tradies. A lot of these guys have been gaslit for decades into thinking working more OT somehow makes them a better person.

      Beyond that, while I haven’t personally seen it yet AI will absolutely begin worming its way into design; a process already riddled with issues and errors largely due to time constraints. Clients are going to want work done faster and cheaper, which will pressure design teams into using AI tools in the name of expediency, which will lead to more errors in the construction process, leading to inflated costs and likely problematic installations.

      That’s not even getting into the future of AI robotics which absolutely will be impacting our tradesmen directly in the near future.

      It’s coming for us too.

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m not an electrician, but I have a relative that is. You nailed it. We’ve got a couple DCs going up near by, and he was asked to commit to a 2 year commitment for just one of them, working exactly the hours you said. He agreed because I think they are paying double time for all OT, and that’s good money. They asked if he wanted to sign on for the other DC but he declined for the obvious time reasons. It’s definitely had an effect on available workers for other projects since seemingly all hand are on deck.

        I’m not familiar with the architecting process, but I can absolutely see how AI will be, if not already, involved with generating plans. It will shit something out faster than anyone could create it, but it will lose that value in review and the inevitable mistakes that make it through. AI is a cancer

    • morgan423@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m thinking about finishing out my career with that kind of transition.

      I’ve always done various office work and have been good at it, but I know I’m on borrowed time.

      At some point in the next 1-3 years, they’ll automate 90%+ of what I’m doing, and I’ll be out the door. And being late 40s, with the job market being what it is, and admittedly me not skilling up much most of the last decade or so… I have I just don’t have what’s needed to get back to work in favorable conditions once that inevitable canning happens.

      Fortunately, I have a friend of the family who’s a long time HVAC guy, and the company he works for has been short handed for quite a while. I figure if I start training up in the very near future, I’ll be able to transition over without too many issues, and If I’m careful, I won’t have to beat myself up too much in the decade or so before I retire.

      I think the powers that be have an ultimate goal of combining AI and robotics to automate the trades too, but they are much further away on that… it should be a safe space for long enough.

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 month ago

    Anything that requires physical work. Manufacturing, trades, etc… But, there’s the caveat that AI may still indirectly affect these too.

  • peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 month ago

    I did this 9 years ago. I make 2/3rds of what I did in software, but I don’t regret it. pivoted to environmental work. My job satisfaction is like, a thousand percent better.

    • hesh@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      Can you say any more about the type of environmental work?

      • peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 month ago

        I started over doing entry level spray tech work treating exotic plants through americorps and worked my way up. I do a lot of field data collection and gis work now. So, I still utilize my old software skills. I work for my local government doing environmental land management.

        GIS is definitely a software adjacent job that is utilized a lot in land management. But that isn’t the initial route I took. I really did just kind of started over.

  • Zeusz13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 month ago

    Anything that’s based on physical work or human contact. Trades, medical/social work, psychology, emergency workers…

      • Zeusz13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        That is the equivalent of saying “we don’t need doctors since we can put bandaids on wounds”

        Psychology is about a lot more that what LLMs can do

        • Teh@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Correct, we don’t need Doctors for every scrape in the exact same way that I can explain a social situation to a LLM and it can help by referencing back to published literature on that particular topic, suggesting clear guidelines as to how to move forward. Sure there are also broken arms and cancer exists, but the base level (and moving up the chain) is absolutely coming for Psych work.

  • olbaidiablo @lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m in building maintenance. It’s not affected at all by AI. Most of the trades are safe. Basically anything which would require both advanced LLM and advanced robotics to replace.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 month ago

      What? Ikea wrecked that a long time ago. Not that you can’t make a living but the demand isn’t high in any way whatsoever. Hand crafted furniture has become a luxury.

      • 404@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        Hand crafted furniture has become a luxury

        So you make more money selling them. I see no issues.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The market for high quality furniture never went away. And if we enter a global depression, a local furniture maker will again be a necessity

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 month ago

          If we enter a depression, people will have less money to spend on luxuries. I just think the percentage of people buying hand made furniture is kind of low. I think most people “buy” them from friends and family doing it as a semi-hobby, or are rich, at least in my experience.

          Not trying to be overly critical, just saying it’s not easy.

          As a side note, I’ve noticed no one makes nice wooden informational kiosks with integrated touch screen even though orgs like museums would likely buy them over plastic and metal ones. Just an idea if you were looking for a niche product.

          • theneverfox@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            I said necessity, not luxury… If we enter a global depression, there won’t be cheap IKEA furniture anymore

  • rabber@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I work in a datacenter. I rack servers, I look after the cooling system, the generators, the ups’s, etc. I won’t ever be replaced by AI. Without me there is no AI. And I barely interact with it. I play with toys all day.

    The environmental impacts still bother me. But IT has always been wasteful, even before AI. I hate recycling days when I see exactly how much plastics, styrofoam and metals are going to the dump.

    • sploosh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Previously the equation was trying to get as much processing out of every kilowatt-hour, now the equation is trying to use as much energy as possible. The impact of AI eclipses IT loads from before by a massive margin, and because of the theory behind it will never, ever do any better than it is right now. The environmental impact should bother you because it’s massive and getting bigger.

      And you’re helping set it up and keep it going. I know what it’s like to run a datacenter, I did it for a decade and a half. I’m not going to say I’m making more money now, but I do sleep much better.

      • rabber@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        My datacenter doesn’t host AI. Most of my servers process data coming from the square kilometer array in Australia. We’re looking for aliens

        Problem is, cost of living is so extremely high where I live and I don’t know what else I would do to make enough money to stay here. I’m really good at this job, and I don’t have very many other talents

        It could be a lot worse too. Our cooling system is a closed loop so we aren’t using fuck tons of water like newer datacenters. In the winter we can mostly get away with air cooling from outside air. And the power in my city is all from hydro dams

            • sploosh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              This person is likely in facilities, I doubt they are touching servers much after they’re racked. Maybe a crash cart is shit really hits the fan and ops can’t get in remotely.

              They went from directly being responsible for AI to having nothing to do with it. My question is not unreasonable.

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    I feel ya. But the pendulum will probably swing back the other way soon and we’ll have a ton of companies hiring to undo/replace slop code. That’s how it has been for previous coding fads, anyway.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    Plumbing is fairly safe from any kind of automation and also well paid.

    They do use robots for pipe inspection and minor repairs, but that’s about the extend of what the clankers will ever be able to do.

  • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    There is the (more difficult) option of finding a dev job for an older tech conservative company. My workplace has just barely rolled out access to copilot chat. Our devs are still doing things without the slop.

    Look at the more heavily regulated business sectors, they tend to be more resistant to tech fads.

  • GreatWhiteBuffalo41@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    I was going to say my industry, sewer and water but now they’re forcing cameras with AI in them into our with vehicle to “save on insurance.” More like spy on us and figure out why we’re messing around with one fire hydrant so long.

    I hate it here.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m a local truck driver for a smallish local trucking company. My company installed new dash cams with both internal and external cameras. Every truck I know has at the internal camera at least covered in tape, if not removed completely (Mine is gone completely). If my company required the internal cameras, at least half the fleet would likely quit and it would be catastrophic for the company.

      One of the perks of the job is being alone and just chilling out most of the day. You don’t get to watch me.

        • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          I have coals in the fire for unionizing my industry. Waiting until later this year where I have a better financial situation as a backup plan in case I need to do it unemployed.

          But when I’m done, my friends and co-workers will be unionized.

          • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            Good luck!

            I’ve grown up in a country where unions are as natural as air. The unions are so strong that there basically is very limited employment laws - and no minimum wage; there’s just not need for the state to intervene that much because unions are EVERYWHERE. And yes, a Big Mac meal costs a fortune because employees actually have to make a living. I’m ok with it.

            • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              Funny enough, our entire industry is unionized except for our sector. From the producers to the plants, everyone is protected except for what we do. It shouldn’t be difficult to get us unionized but it’s still a rather uphill battle. And talking to some of my co-workers, everyone is willing but I’m the only one taking the lead on it.

      • GreatWhiteBuffalo41@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah I’m moving across the country soon so it won’t be my problem but 3/4 of the people who work there are already looking for jobs because of other micromanaging shit that’s started happening. We’re the highest producing, lowest issue location and all of a sudden they’re treating us like toddlers. Everyone is pissed.

        • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m a highly intelligent person. It’s always been both infuriating and absolutely dumbfounded how management of a company can have all the information on how their company is run, how employee interviews, evaluations, and observations occur, how profit growth vs expenditures relate to each other, and still sit down in a board room together and not only brainstorm, but literally agree to an idea that makes their company fucking worse in every possible way, and piss off everyone who is why they’re in this position.

          I will never understand it. Especially with my company who doesn’t have shareholders or shit. We’re a completely private and insular company. We’re family owned. And yet they still make decisions that hurt them by pissing off the people that work for them.

          It’s fascinating.

          • GreatWhiteBuffalo41@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah that’s the same setup as my company. I have a feeling, because I’ve been here before, that the owner of my company is looking to sell. This is exactly what we went through at my last company and then they announced that they sold out. Oddly enough 5 of us all worked at that place. I’m really really beyond sick of private equity.

    • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’re joking me right? I’m pretty sure this is actively happening. they’re going to put the kids in individual tubes with iPads and a toilet

      • ChristerMLB@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not my experience, at least not here in Norway – in fact, there’s been a pretty big backlash against the digitalization of childhood in schools and kindergartens, so I’d be very surprised if there’s any increasing pressure on us to use computers at all with the children. A colleague of mine put on some movies a handful of times in December, and even that caused some concerned messages from parents.

        • Sequence5666@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Unfortunately the countries with high population and public education being negligible, have really low pay.

          I heard Norway and Sweden kindergarten teachers get 120,000 USD ! that sounds great.

          • ChristerMLB@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            hehe, I wish, but no, the starting salary is more like $55 000, increasing to about $65 000 as you get more experience.

            • Sequence5666@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              oh no. That does sound low. But i do believe if your interest lies in teaching it brings you joy.

              Can someone in their late twenties start teaching in nordic schools? Or do they have to begin studying for 2+ diploma courses?

              • ChristerMLB@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                30 days ago

                It’s a three year bachelor’s degree to become a kindergarten teacher in Norway. You can work in kindergarten without that education, but then you’ll be more of an assistant and your salary will be even lower.

                You’d also have to learn Norwegian, of course, unless you can get a job at one of the very few english-language international kindergartens.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s so bad for a child’s development. A computer can’t guide a kid’s hand to practice fine motor skills. It can’t impart social skills to help kids interact with each other. It can’t help kids revolve conflicts with each other, or handle behaviors that require a human touch. Imagine a couple kids fighting because they can’t share - what’s a computer gonna do? A kid can just ignore its instructions. What’s to stop a kid from physically attacking a robo-nanny or whatever fresh hell gets developed in this field?

        I work with kids with difficult behaviors. There are ethical boundaries we need to be aware of. Will a robo-nanny be imparted with those rules? How accountable would it be if it did something ethically questionable? What will it be trained on - actual knowledge of children’s psychology (in which case, using a robot at all should be discounted right off, as children thrive on human interaction)? Or will it be trained on what parents/teachers have already been doing, which would inevitably result in being trained on outdated techniques that don’t follow updates in science? If a robot thinks spanking, isolation, or withholding food is okay, that’d be extremely troubling. There’s so much that could go wrong, and knowing this tech isn’t being designed with ethics in mind makes this whole endeavor terrifying.

        Are parents going to be comfortable with their kids being alone in a room without an adult? A group of kids could simply band together to lock the robot in a closet or something and let chaos reign. They could figure out how to power it down, or throw things at it until it stops functioning. A kid having a tantrum can be a powerful force, potentially injuring other children in the act, and I highly doubt a robot alone could handle that situation effectively. Where I work it can take a team of adults with blocking pads, and coordination with even more adults to clear other students from the area. Sometimes those other kids are playing games and don’t want to leave, and it takes a trusted adult to convince them that yeah, no, we need to move now. Which brings us to the relationship the teachers have with the students, and how it is crucial to gaining what’s called “instructional control,” which basically means, “this kid will listen to your instructions.” Can a robot foster that? Do we want a robot to be able to foster that? I don’t like the idea of kids personifying machines to that extent, and we’re quickly learning how damaging (literally, it can cause brain damage) that can be for young minds.

        I could go on and on, but suffice to say this whole topic is an ethical clusterfuck.