• PugJesus@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    All identities are arbitrary though.

    For that matter, nationalism was *anti-*reactionary in its strongest period, in the 19th century.

    Nationalism is reactionary today because it is established, and anything already well-established is a target for reactionaries, who use concepts with pre-existing attachments to dupe useful idiots into thinking that the enemies of the reactionaries and the enemies of the establishment are one and the same. Nearly any period of significant political or cultural upheaval will show that simplistic narrative flies in the face of facts. But they aren’t targeting engaged, politically aware folk. They’re targeting people who are scared and don’t want to think about it too much.

    Not that nationalism is all that great to begin with. But it’s not particularly different than any other conception of identity.

    • bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      💯 I was just going to post, how does the idea of India enforce colonialism? Identity is a hammer both sides have employed, I would argue it now mostly helps the right, but, everything changes with time