• 0 Posts
  • 53 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 29th, 2024

help-circle
  • I have no doubt that that code is over complicated and inaccessible and probably needs a full rewrite that actually makes it accessible and effective.

    That said, I’m sure there are far too many builders that are looking for the cheap and easy loopholes that certainly contributed to its current state.

    Literally yesterday I found a beam in a 2007 apartment build that has been secured to the slab above with framing nails. This should have been done with a proper concrete bolt or anchor. The nails were failing and the whole ceiling was starting to fall.

    Honestly. I think the government should design a cookie cutter 3 bed house that is standardised and easy to build, easy to check and certify the build. Buy or hell even make the framing and materials locally in bulk and start pumping out the same house over and over again.


  • It turns out to be more of a gang coperation. A decent number of archeological research projects around the Mediterranean are funded by much larger physics grants. They fund the exploration and the anthropologists and other researchers can keep everything, publish the findings etc, as long as the physics project gets all the lead that they find at the bottom of the ocean.






  • It’s certainly already made it worse. And I have been knocking back a lot of papers that at first look sound amazing but on deeper reading say nothing of value. The common trend now is to make a paper sound like you have done the experiment when actually it was just a thought experiment or simulation. I have seen theory papers with diagrams you would expect from an experimental students PhD thesis.

    It’s having a terrible impact on the review process. I have been getting clearly LLM responses from reviewers for manuscripts, emdashes and flowery language all over the place but saying nothing of value. Which sucks because decent reviewers are often a big help when progressing research.

    But the bigger issue is that in general I think the review system is overwhelmed. I recently got a single line reviewer response for a manuscript submitted to Optics express, a journal I would have considered above such issues in the past. The quality of review is in freefall right now.

    I have talked to colleges around the country that feel the same way. I don’t think the existing system will continue in the old way much longer. At this point, youa re almost better off putting a groundbreaking discovery straight on the arXiv and just skipping the peer review process. It is basically just a waste of time now, and only still exists as a gatekeeping step into prestigious journals. I also look at younger researches with high h indexes suspiciously. How much time did you spend gaming the paper system as opposed to actually doing useful research that takes time but generates less papers?







  • Swiss institution author that only mentioned a single Australian study. And their main argument is that the animals that cats kill could be breeding faster than the cats are killing them. Hence it’s not a problem.

    It’s a fair point if we are talking about rats or noisy minors. It’s not a valid argument if we consider any form of endangered species, of which Aus has many.



  • All good mate, I mostly just try and stop the spread of misinformation on Aus gun laws. Most people don’t know much about them.

    The leaver actions are fast. The main difference is that you can leave your finger on the trigger for a pump and are meant to take it off for the leaver action, though you could do it with your non trigger hand. People are also buying left handed bolt action shotguns to get around this, though it’s more awkward. All our shotguns have a capacity limit, usually 5 or less. It looks like these guys modified their barrel mags to hold more.

    You’re not wrong about wasted ammo, reliability and reload speed, but you have to think about the worst case scenarios. Situation: close range, large dense crowd, shooter with an unreasonable amount of ammunition, and best luck in the world with no jams or reliability issues. That’s the formula for mass casualties. This is what our laws are effective at protecting against, primarily by limiting the rate of fire.



  • Yeah no shit mate. That’s why pump shotguns are also under a cat C licence here. The legislators weren’t stupid, they basically categorised things on fire rate and public danger.

    The Adler lever actions are very questionable in my opinion. They are almost as fast. Though the one I tried would jam all the time. Lever actions like that weren’t a common thing in the 90’s so it slipped by for a while.

    And saying that a bolt action is potentially worse than a semi auto is some full on American bulshit. Sure things can jam and go wrong, but in the worst case situation with aresholes like this firing into a dense crowd where aim doesn’t really matter, faster shooting is more casualties.



  • Never heard of this but are they deliberately made to taste bad? Seems like a clever idea. The nicotine is there if you need it but the terrible taste puts you off.

    That said, cigarettes smell awful to me and people keep going so I can’t imagine how bad they would have to taste.


  • https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07209

    I can’t stand these popular science articles that just cherry pick phrases from a paper. tl;dr it’s a very promising result but more observation of other galaxies or other mass consistent observations is needed before we should believe this.

    However, the signal from the MW halo alone does not constitute the definitive proof of dark matter annihilation. Detection of annihilation signals from other objects or regions with consistent WIMP parameters will be crucial for the final confirmation. Gamma-ray observations of dwarf galaxies in the MW halo are fascinating from this perspective.

    I would say the most exciting part is this gives us a mass range to optimise the search with earth based detectors. Start looking for 0.5-0.8 TeV masses.