deleted by creator

prison system (whose acronym was GULAG)

Afaik not true. The average westerner may think so, but GULAG is an acronym for a specific part of the system.

I just find this funny. I’ll stumble upon it in the sidebar of hexbears anarchism comm once in a while, together with the other funny versions of it.

2 of your charts are the same

somehow a www seems to have sneaked it’s way into that nadeko link? I can’t connect to it with it at least.

You can see the modlog for a user (assuming you are using Lemmy through the web, I’m not sure about apps) by clicking the three dots with a downwards pointing arrow and then clicking on “[username] Moderation History”

You have mp4 selected in the recording format, vp9 is not supported in mp4 as far as i can tell, if you change it to matroska (mkv) does it then work?

Edit: I just opened OBS and checked the settings, it will say “(Incompatible with [insert format])” so that’s not it.

edit: don’t know why italics isn’t working

I think multi-line italics isn’t a thing. Although you may actually want to prefix the lines with > to make it into a quote like the first line of this comment.

Instead of well actuallying it, I would like to ask: how? How do you get these resources to be managed “better.” How do we go from where we are now to what you have stated?

So, was the Soviet Union proposing an anti-fascist alliance in 1929?

ten years

1939-1933 is 6.

The basic course link is also to a specific comment (the last /24024661 part)

Poland. Rumania

The UK and France helped destroy Czechoslovakia. And did the farce that was nonintervention.

https://lemmy.world/post/38937776

Presumably “The Worldview and Philosophical Methodology of Marxism-Leninism”

https://www.lunaoi.com/product/the-worldview-and-philosophical-methodology-of-marxism-leninism-preorder/?sync-done

https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Library:Curriculum_of_the_Basic_Principles_of_Marxism-Leninism_Part_1

Very interesting, I should read it sometime (aka never, as if I am currently reading anything)

To my knowledge, the DPRK is the only socialist country that has implemented direct elections at all levels. Neither the Soviet Union (in its time) nor China have embraced a complete system of direct elections

Since it is only a short excerpt, there may be some context missing. Or I may be misinterpreting it, I am putting particular importance on “complete,” there is some thing that the USSR didn’t do that makes him consider it not complete? But it seems to me to be incorrect, the soviets did have direct elections after the 1936 constitution?

Instead of a Congress of delegates electing an Executive Committee, the supreme authority of every territory in the U.S.S.R. will now be a directly elected Supreme Soviet or Council. The citizens will directly elect their deputies not only to the local Soviet, but to the provincial and district Soviets, to the Supreme Council of their Republic, and to the Supreme Council of the U.S.S.R., which will replace the Congress of Soviets and the Central Executive Committee

Soviet Democracy

https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/i-wont-vote/

Since I was twenty-one in 1889, I have in theory followed the voting plan strongly advocated by Sidney Lens in The Nation of August 4, i.e., voting for a third party even when its chances were hopeless, if the main parties were unsatisfactory; or, in absence of a third choice, voting for the lesser of two evils

deleted by creator

That second image with the open hand is… slightly gross. Maybe change it?