Yes, and also marginalia-search.com

I’m curious how many Restore votes are former Reform voters who are attracted to the more hard-line stance, and how many are former Reform voters who are too dumb or inattentive to tell the two (admittedly quite similar) names apart

Sounds sexist

They’re the subset of elected MPs who the Prime Minister chooses to become Ministers in the Cabinet - ie MPs given charge of specific departments

It means they can pass laws in this circumstance without a full debate or a vote in Parliament, which would include both the Opposition and any backbench MPs from the government’s own side who might disagree

I have to say that, apart from occasional popups suggesting premium subscription, I’ve not seen the experience change much - yet. The app has had cosmetic changes, but these haven’t been negative. It’s possible there is note coming down the line, but right now I’m still using it fine

You think this is just people over 70?

Ah, nice. I have a Wera ratchet screwdriver and it’s nice kit

I just moved all my photos from Google to Ente to get them out of the US… How’s Euria?

Which brands please?

The ads ​are separate from the answers generated by ChatGPT and do not influence its ​outputs.

For how long, I wonder

Perhaps. However, we have to acknowledge that there’s a price to be paid for this - particularly an environmental price - and it’s not the householder who pays that price. If where we lived didn’t have consequences for other people then it wouldn’t be an issue. But when these decisions lock in urban sprawl, car dependency and excess emissions, they become everybody’s business

I love Dinosaur Comics. For anyone just discovering this, there are SO MANY for you to catch up on

Reform support has slowly but steadily been dropping for months now. Is it because their supporters are dying off, or because their supporters can’t tell the difference between Reform and Restore? Who can say? But Reform have peaked and are now fading. Don’t present them as inevitable

The “e” isn’t relevant here, and I’d worry that drawing attention to it risks setting micromobility back

I’d rather not - we’re then into copyright issues

It’s only a very short letter, but it’s good. They argue that AGI claims are based on shifting the definition of AGI to something easier to meet, that advocates rely on hitting artificial (gameable) benchmarks rather than dealing with novelty, and that providing answers to questions doesn’t mean they’re doing cognition as we’d normally understand it, especially as LLMs don’t express doubt (they don’t say this, but I’ll add: this is because they can’t do metacognition: they can’t think about their own thought processes, as we can)

The best place to hide drugs would be up another dog’s arse. Nobody is going to be suspicious when the sniffer dog shows an interest

Lovely pictures

There’s a whole section on social media. That’s where they discuss Mastodon and W, among others