

R


R


Anyone who takes them up on their offer to buy a new Kindle should check themselves in for a mental health screening.
They just told all of their customers that you cannot trust a device you buy from them will continue to work in the future. So buy one from a different manufacturer and hope they aren’t as evil
I get that it may be expensive to perpetually support old devices but there is surely a middle ground between supporting them and bricking them.
Even if you have a large library on kindle I hope you have the ‘calibre’ to move devices.

Anti-wokeness can be directly tied to many of society’s current problems. So maybe that means the answer is an indirect “yes”?
I mean if people are going to go around thinking and empathizing with others we wouldn’t be able to bomb the middle East every 20 years, would we?


Relax, don’t worry it’s below the all important 50k paedo protection threshold so we can talk about this and everything else for the time being


If James bond is in the mix, what about goldeneye?


That’s what I was thinking. Meta is poison.


Well not taking anything from him, but with so many people involved in a TV production I think it would have come out in some form that dissent was being suppressed.


Banning something is a sure fire way to give it oxygen. Streisand effect
The problem Trump has in doing this type of suppression is that it gains more attention and riles people up more than if he had let the interview air. Sure the interview might have said things he didn’t want to be said, but now he has made this a much bigger issue and he looks weak because he is scared at the mere prospect of some words being uttered.


“To impress a chick…”


It’s about permission. These guys have always been there harbouring their evil thoughts but the system never allowed them to indulge.
Now they have permission.


Maybe I was not eloquent enough, but I don’t object to the research being done. I think though that the result is the expected one and therefore it is not noteworthy enough to post on here. Doubtless this paper with end up highly cited.


I mean this feels like an obvious result. Are we thinking this is ground breaking?
Like comparing 3 ways of making a table, hand tools, power tools or paying someone to make it for you. Then asking which required the most effort.
I mean I know it’s important to confirm even expected results but this feels so intuitive.


Now this is a proper answer, thank you.


I’m not assuming anything. I’m asking a question about why the official, legal route can be bypassed.
I’ve been thinking about those guys a lot lately. Especially when the articles about AI making us dumber started coming out.
It was actually a very insightful depiction of future humans


Of course they are. They want to shine a spotlight on the most prominent Democrat in the files so that he becomes associated with the files. They either hope the association changes from trump to Clinton or that the Democrats will see one of their idols in the cross hairs and back down.
We all know though that the Democrats stated position though is if anyone did wrong, prosecute regardless of politics.
Trump doesn’t seem to realise his documented close association with Epstein makes his absence from the files that are released highly suspicious. If it really is innocent, then realising all of the evidence would clear Trump. Instead he is releasing non incriminating things about Clinton and redacting everyone else. I mean they really do not respect the American people at all, they think they are dumb and can be manipulated into believing whatever they want. Except it isn’t working this time…


It is brain washing. They have been convinced that Democrats are so much worse for so long that they think of they had voted another way, somehow they would be having an even harder time.
It has become a matter of faith not logic. This is just a test of their faith and it will all come good in the end.
I think they are more like cell mates. Stuck in the same small room. Can’t leave. Warden checks on them periodically and gives them terrible food to eat…
I’d say she is a social democrat.
… but to most Americans that is far left and thus labelled socialism because America is a very right wing country. Even the ‘left’ in America is basically a right wing party in most other western democracies.