Governments hold a “really entrenched belief that if people actually saw war in all its gory awfulness that it would be untenable to pursue military ventures.”
Well, no shit, Sherlock. There is a reason democracies typically need to seek consent of the people to start one.
No, I think what our Canadian friend is saying is that the hole in the last panel has an incongruent perspective. When the camera is top side looking down at the hole, the hole shape should be mirrored. If you consider the character topside looking down in the third panel, the little tail of the speech bubble hole is on their right, but in the fourth panel it is on their left.
S-tier: That big breath you just took because someone asked about your hobby obsession and you’re so excited to share. All obvious signs that the question was a polite rhetorical one are never observed.
The Cody Showdy!
Believable given how robots spit out tokens.
Well not with that loser attitude. Man up and tell the beetus to get thee behind me. Take a silicone spatula with you so you can really get into the corners.
Pretty sure this paper is 100% bullshit and this is crackpot territory.
Author starts with a ton of assertions, none of them cited. Invents new nomenclature without proper definition. Takes two completely different kinds of measurements (an EEG connected to a human, the author presumably, and a quantum chip probably something stupid in AWS), doesn’t explain the setup of those measurements or the methodology, calls them ricci curvature dynamics which is nonsense as far as I can tell. Then goes about finding patterns in the noise between these two systems and makes wild leaps of the imagination that this shit is actually correlated.
Did you read the paper? Can you explain it? Because I actually did read this trash. I am gonna guess that you just watched the shitty vid and didn’t actually read the paper or apply any critical thinking here.
3d old account. Vague synopsis. Waffling about truthiness. Sketchy link that doesn’t go to a well-known video site.
Oh, I speak evangelical, unfortunately. It definitely is some kind of proselytizing women’s group. Likely the group tries to lure victims to these lunches and they get a healthy helping of Jesus along with some BBQ.
I don’t think so
It less fun if you well-ackshually, but I appreciate the scholarship
lol as if we aren’t already enslaved to the rich in this last stage capitalist hellhole
yeah, the trappings of a death cult didn’t sit well with him, plus the whole cross thing was a real turn off. Imagine if a guillotine had killed you and you come back to see a religion spring up using guillotines as their symbol
Jesus is a bit of a fluid concept to these people. We just had a weekend where the zombie wizard (also known as a lich) reanimates himself and goes around spooking people for a couple of days before skedaddling on up to heaven or something. He’ll be back though. They’ve got a book written by a dude that obviously was schizophrenic that describes the future and the conditions required for it to happen as if they can tickle it into existence and Jesus will come back. I think they can find a way to make it justified
Goddamn it feels good to be a gansta.
Pee Cee Load Letter?! What the fuck does that mean?!
who tf are you, the culture police?
This should have been a post instead of a comment
Yeah, it is a bit classist. Not everyone has the same economic opportunities to go to college and try horse piss.
Why would drinking human piss be any better?
Goes to the future and finds no bones. Well, yeah, actually that makes the most sense. Assuming a single timeline, you poof’d out of existence! Of course, if you did find bones, very like they are not yours and now you have a weird Memento situation where you’re investigating why you would have buried someone else’s bones in your own grave.