• 2 Posts
  • 1.07K Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 22nd, 2025

help-circle






  • CannonFodder@lemmy.worldtoCanada@lemmy.caLegal age
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    With proportional representation, the liberals would likely form minority governments for the foreseeable future. Small groups would be king makers. Except they wouldn’t - all they’d do was cause the government to fail and then a new election would again always give us a liberal minority.



  • CannonFodder@lemmy.worldtoCanada@lemmy.caLegal age
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not really what happened. Trudeau and the liberals wanted preferential ranked ballots as election reform. They formed a committee to do research and establish facts on this. The committee said they’d never get it off the ground. The other parties, and other players wouldn’t accept it and it would be a disaster. They didn’t want proportional representation, so they gave up. Their messaging was terrible, but they would have gone with ranked ballots if they thought it would be reasonably doable. It wasn’t, so instead they concentrated on other things.





  • Mainstream approval is kinda important to win elections. It would be great to have a more progressive dem in power, but if it means they lose the election it doesn’t help. That said, as much as I hate it, a white old man is what’s needed to win. One with a face of compromise, but a desire to root out corruption, play hardball with the previous administration cronies. One that can frame progressive ideology within economic prosperity. And one that will pushback hard on Isreal without calling for its destruction. It’s a tough balance. And the progressive left would still probably fuck it up and give power to the right,




  • I think the mechanism in question is more on the brain side. Where certain sets of nerves are processed, if some are missing that area of brain simply adjusts the input strength of others. I suspect adult amputation is different from amputation of a newborn since the brain elasticity is so different. But all we can do it make educated guesses anyway since we can’t do controlled experiments. Studies involving watching brain activity can only go so far to really reflect experience. So we can’t know. I’m just pointing out that the common sense approach you indicated isn’t matched by some clear data. So it’s not cut and dry. It could even be that men circumcised at birth experience more sexual pleasure.



  • There’s plenty of signals coming from the nerve bundles in the area. Phantom pain seems to need larger sets of nerve bundles removed/unstimulated. Is s not fully understood, but that seems to be how it works. People who lose fingers often do get increased sensitivity on other fingers and they can also get phantom pain.



  • CannonFodder@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldtype shit
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    The brain is weird and whacky the way it works. It has a sort of auto-gain. The less nerve stimulus over time leads to a higher sensitivity of remaining nerves. Often when people lose a limb, they still feel pain in it - the lack of nerve signals causes the remaining nerve endings to be amplified so much that despite not even having pain receptors, the noise signals are perceived as pain. So a human growing up with a cut forskin simply adapts and the brain perceives more sensitivity from the other nerves to produce the same levels of sensation.