But that’s really sad, if you think about it.
“Generally in the USA, it’s considered suspicious.”
That means generally, Americans are unaware of these father-child activities.
That means generally, Americans didn’t have a good father.
Now, a lot of people would intuitively jump to “Nah my dad was ok” - but if this isn’t normal behaviour for you, then you’re just unaware of how bad your whole frame of reference is. That is a tough pill to swallow, though.
“Let people enjoy things” is a thought terminating clichee, though.
Not really different than “I didn’t order a yappuccino”.
It’s denying any criticism, and with that mindset you get flat earthers, vaccine deniers, and trump voters.
In other words: “Let people criticize things”.
Nobody is denying anyone a counter argument, but “let other people do what they want” is not a valid one.
I don’t care about this show, just fed up with it becoming the standard to validate any behavior with those thought stoppers.
Yeah it’s not like it’s 14 years old or something like that!
I think that’s a slight pun.
The “-archy” part comes from the greek for “to rule/command”. Monarchy = rule by a king, oligarchy = rule by few, etc.
And the “an-” part means “not” or “without”. So anarchy technically means “not ruled” or “without rule” - but if things are still being ruled, it would still be an “archy”, not a “not archy”.
The chance that they agreed on that and she wouldn’t mention it is slim, though
Yeah recently had this happen in the. Net world for some projects: They went from free to commercial or some other reason, and then people quickly forked the last version before that. All with that idea that they’re the defenders of what was good about it.
But let’s face it, if you had anywhere near the interest and commitment to that subject matter, you’d already be maintaining a competing project, or be helping at the original one.
I think people are enticed by the glory of having a repo with many stars, but have no realistic idea how much of their time this would eat up if they were serious about it.
Well, there ARE torpedoes that pretend to be a ship in order to trick ships and other torpedoes to go for them, instead of the submarine that fired it.
But yeah “specifically” designed to sink ships sounds weird when that’s what most of them, with only few exceptions, do.
“would probably be seen as sensible had it not been for hindsight” is a lifestyle
If I ask for a burger and you give me a good fake meat patty, I’m happy.
If I ask for a burger and you give me a mushroom sandwich or bruschetta or anything like that, I will check for signs of stroke in both of us
we’re talking about regular people
I thought we’re talking about Hüseyin Dogru?
Yes, it is forgotten in the history books nowadays, but the real ones remember: The soviets mass-murdered their own people in order to punish Churchill.
Partly… Look at the original Nazis. The nazi part is usually added to make the distinction with different periods - but for that period, the whole nation is referred to as nazi Germany.
The only way this answer could have been more hung up on the letter instead of the spirit of that comment, would be if you had said “with just your eyes you can watch a video explaining that the world is round”.
Actually it’s interesting, because I guess they’re musicals, but they’re not filling them with, like, musical music anymore.
Instead it’s now just pop songs, you know, standard verse-chorus pattern etc., because then it can get in the charts and make more money that way.
We probably won’t get anything close to a “Poor unfortunate souls”, “Bear neccessities” or “Be prepared” ever again.
Already any plans for becoming childless?
Well… studying computer science in order to write production code, is like studying chemistry to become a chef.
I can assure you, unlike OP, I am comfortable using different collection types as the tools they are, even without having spent years studying the theory behind them.
I’m sure many of us would prefer “Fuck you, Endymion”.
Based on other protests, probably?
Apart from that, killing 12000 people is a huge effort even for a military using artillery and whatnot. If you have some military insight, just think of the logistics.
Or compare to the massacres Nazis did in WW2. Extreme cases like the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising had something like 20000 people killed on site, so you see how believing that they pulled of more than half of that here, without all the supporting context the nazis had, is not a given.
Technically yes, but in the context of symbols (which is what this is about) it doesn’t work.
If you stumbled upon a sign with a bug exoskeleton, you’d think “ah yes, this means death”?
Aside from purely theoretical, philosophical interest (suuuure), it doesn’t really matter, does it?
“Ah yes, now that you showed us the opinion of these online strangers on your phone, we will be ok angering your father - the man who famously hires ex-legionnaires for protection of his family - for a little hanky panky.”