He should not be holding a sermon in the first place.

I agree.

That is the main issue.

I guess?

It is rather inconsequential if the goobledegook he says differs from regular sermon goobledegook.

No, I don’t think so. It matters whether he is sincere or just a grifter.

“I shouldn’t have to tell you about my expertise for you to find my input valuable!” Weird hill to die on, but okay

I think the issue was mixing in non-bible material, without disclosing it, during a sermon.

No, this is a new image - you’d notice if you compared them. Also, do you actually believe the slop Trump posted is effective propaganda to anyone but his cult following?

I can see being against this post because AI. Your point, not so much.

It’s ridiculous, it literally looks like an AI was asked to Chad-ify Trump.

Edit: Spelling

I was trying to be polite, and leave room in case I had misunderstood. A simple clarification of what you meant would have sufficed.

This is real?

Show more

attach women

Did you mean ‘attack’?

They’re involuntarily gritting out their words every time the noice happens.

For short clips, I think that this kind of “this guy said this” content is very achievable for AI - example (tbf this one is still ‘person-based’ as it’s motion capture controlled)

Thanks for attempting to explain it.

You seem to have gotten Gemini and Claude mixed up? Your previous comment only mentioned Gemini.

Bolding mine:

If the article mentioned a “bullet that killed Charlie Kirk,” it is likely referring to a viral piece of misinformation or a specific satirical news story. Charlie Kirk is alive; therefore, any article claiming he was killed by a bullet is either: Satire: (e.g., The Onion or The Babylon Bee style content). Misinformation: A hoax designed to trigger a reaction.

Um, does Gemini not know that Charlie Kirk is dead?? (Yes I know AI doesn’t really “know” things)

The neck folds look identical to me.

This reminds me of the Saw puppet.

I saw the movie, it was very enjoyable.

Eh, to each their own I guess. I don’t like how snug the bodice looks, nor am I a fan of constantly managing my leg positioning and monitoring the breeze lest I expose myself - and that is without even mentioning sun protection. But you do you.

Compares dressing for presentation vs dressing for comfort

“Lol genders amirite”

Ow, my heart!

Yes, but I only have a source in Swedish (specifically the later part of the video). To summarize: The national media SVT has this ‘task-force’ that verifies/debunks claims being spread on social media. In the video I linked to, they compare the clip Israel posted of Netanyahu getting coffee with pictures the cafe took and earlier posted pictures of the cafe. The same was done for the outside of the cafe shown in a different clip. Everything was highly consistent and unlikely to be AI. The only oddity, a disappearing ring, is likely due to video quality and/or hand positioning.