The surge of interest in Bendell’s paper showed that people were craving answers about just how bad things will get, and how soon. Some were so shaken after reading it, they made major life decisions: to quit their jobs, to join a radical protest group, to move somewhere they felt would be safer to ride out the chaos. But Deep Adaptation also sparked a debate over whether Bendell went too far in his conclusions about climate science and what it meant for society, spreading a sense of defeat.
Today, Bendell’s ominous predictions feel simultaneously dated and prescient. Climate change has slipped out of the public conversation amid wars in Gaza and Iran, and seemingly endless political chaos. It’s become just one of many contenders in scientists’ discussions over the possible drivers of doomsday, eclipsed by nuclear war and artificial intelligence. But the general mood has shifted toward the fate he imagined: Surveys show that the public’s optimism about the future is fading, hitting the lowest level since pollsters at Gallup started asking. A recent study found that one in three Americans now think the world will end in their lifetime.
Seems to miss THE fundamental-current in actual-unwravelling-of-the-whole-world: highjacking-of-the-world-by-the-right.
Elisabeth Haich identified that hard-right-turn that happens at the end of EVERY Age ( the Age of Pisces is ended, the Age of Aquarius, which only means that the north-pole is pointed into that direction more, as the Earth’s gyroscopic-precession winds backwards through the zodiac ).
So, it’s the end of an Age, & the hard-right-turn is happening, & unless it is mitigated successfully … then it’ll be rampaging ideologies, right to the complete-extinguishment of humankind…
Why is it so-consistently humankind’s unconscious-ignorance which we fail to account-for, in our future-projections?
I think that’s important, & needs to be made into a conscious part of our projection-validity-verification checklists…
_ /\ _



