• 198 Posts
  • 1.63K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 20th, 2023

help-circle





  • Flock cameras can also pickup conversations of people passing by, let alone the massive amount of other privacy concerns with these being owned by third party companies and how extremely easily hackable these cameras are.

    IMO, I don’t see how people in Toronto can support these cameras, especially since Ontario in general had speed cameras removed, and those as far as I know were police operated.

    TBH it would probably make more sense to install the speed cameras back, those only captured photos as opposed to 24/7 recordings.

    Some links that you might find useful:

    Find locations of flock cameras: https://deflock.org/

    How hackers can use flock cameras to monitor and stock neighborhoods:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vU1-uiUlHTo

    Video that is worth a watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pp9MwZkHiMQ

    Edit: Went down a rabbit hole.

    Toronto’s speed cameras were owned, operated, and maintained by Verra Mobility (specifically through their subsidiary, Redflex Traffic Systems (Canada) Limited). This is a Arizona-based company. While the City of Toronto selected the locations and processed the tickets. I can’t seem to find any clear info on how the data was processed or how the system was secured.














  • Or you know, you can let parents take care of their own kids. Stop telling me how to parent my own kids in my own house!

    Also obligatory reminder, consumer home routers have had parental controls for years. You can use these functions to whitelist specific websites for your children, while simultaneously block everything not on said whitelist.

    On top of this, this is the most privacy respectful option as it means no third party is snooping on what sites your visiting, no one is collecting analytics, and no personal information is made available to said third parties to be hacked and compromised, ultimately protecting you from any identity theft.

    On top of this this “same issue” was why TVs have had parental controls for ages. All a parent would need to do is choose to enable and block certain channels behind a passcode/pin for their children. And somehow this solution has worked without being privacy intrusive.


  • I love how these data breach articles never go into what the next step are that someone should/could do to protect themselves, or what the company is doing now to make sure customers are protected, and possibly compensated for any potentially repercussions of said breach.

    Also who is ultimately liable for the exposure of said information, and as a customer could I ask a company to delete all identifiable information on me while still maintaining an account?