Em Adespoton

  • 2 Posts
  • 4.3K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 4th, 2023

help-circle



  • A CCTV setup likely won’t work for people who just want a video doorbell.

    But replacing a Ring with something like a Reolink means they can start with the same service, and over time move to RTSP and a local server as they become more aware of privacy implications and are driven to invest in a contained system.

    Likely people will never go CC though, as the entire point for most people is to see what shows up at their door when they’re not at home.




  • Let’s play a word game. You can say “kill” and “all Christians” on TV, but put the two together and you’re likely going to be censored for inciting violence.

    Words have meanings and so do sentences.

    “Oh, God” when taken literally just means that you’re appealing to some more powerful being to sort out what you’ve witnessed.

    “Damn it” means that you want ”it” to go to hell and stay there, with no chance for salvation.

    “God damn it” means you’re calling on a specific interpretation of a deity that is associated with damning things to do so on your request.

    And that’s all stuff that’s OK to say if you mean it. The blasphemy comes in when you say it without actually believing or wanting such a thing to happen, but just use the phrase as an outburst of frustration.

    Kind of like shouting “bomb” in an airport. If you really believe there is one, you’re going to want to do it; otherwise, you’re going to get in a heap of trouble precisely because those in charge don’t want the word to lose its meaning in that context, because then people won’t respond properly when it’s said in earnest.



  • Higher learning teaches students how to think critically (or develop a very good short term memory).

    But it doesn’t necessarily teach students TO think critically.

    They’re taught the tools they can use, but using those tools takes effort and causes discomfort. So most people choose to use them as little as possible.

    So, the main difference is: people (speaking generally) who have some post-high school education have developed the tools to approach a topic in an intelligent manner. This means that, given enough effort, you can help them understand a topic. Without that toolkit, trying to show them how something is more likely true based on evidence is often pointless. But having that toolkit isn’t going to make them automatically come to evidence-based conclusions.








  • The other answers are missing out on the key reason: licensing.

    Copyright law differs between regions, and so different groups need to be paid when the video is “sold” to a customer. Before the early 2000s, this was even more the case than it is today; the US hadn’t yet tied its own definition of copyright to all its trade agreements.

    End result? Selling a US DVD in Japan would have been illegal; not because of the region restrictions but because the people who had to be paid to play it in that region hadn’t been paid so the DVD was effectively a bootleg.