• 0 Posts
  • 39 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle
  • lucastoLinux@lemmy.mlSystemd preparing to comply with age verification laws
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    Of course it does. This particular change may seem innocuous in itself, but the idea of compliance with ridiculous laws like this one, in one jurisdiction, being implemented in a project used globally will result in compromising everyone’s privacy/security, regardless of whether they are even subject to that law or not.

    If anything, it’s more troubling for those outside the relevant jurisdiction, since we get 0 say on the laws, and have no actual reason to comply.


  • lucastoQuark'sThe Trouble with Review Bombing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    That makes sense. I’m generally extremely sceptical of critics, to start with, so I would not generally red flag that discrepancy (Look at the awards shows, they frequently are at odds with what is actually popular, since they are fundamentally coming at things from a different angle). But the other criteria, all taken together, do seem strong indicators, so that makes sense, which is a shame.

    Personally, I was pleasantly surprised, but only because the bar of expectation was extremely low. Over all, I still don’t think it’s particularly great on the whole (although it had its moments). I just wish we could have more discourse about the things it did well/badly without it constantly falling into the woke/anti-woke nonsense, all the time. (For me, at least, ‘too woke’/‘not woke enough’ has nothing to do with its issues - they’re all about storytelling and handling of established lore/canon)


  • lucastoQuark'sThe Trouble with Review Bombing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Genuine question: How do we decide when a show is being ‘review bombed’ Vs being actually just disliked? The article doesn’t really give any evidence of this claim. (To be clear, I’m not saying it’s not being, just need a little bit more than ‘I personally enjoy it, therefore the negative reviews must be bad faith’, which seems to be most of what I see).




  • lucastoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldHow to run programs sandboxed on a work pc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    What kind of dystopia are you living in that listening to music or podcasts would ‘raise the alarm’? Yes, don’t do anything inappropriate (definitely no piracy, obviously), or detrimental to productivity, but listening to music? Would definitely quit if an employer had a problem with that.

    Is this a thing that’s considered ‘normal’ in the US? (I’m assuming US mainly because other countries are not generally so hostile towards employees)


  • Precisely. SSD puts the decorations in the hands of your window manager, which allows you to customise what information and controls are available in the title bar (or if you even want to display one at all), so you can use the space much more efficiently. With CSD, you’re down to the whims and opinions of the application, and their space-wasting choices (and whether they even choose to respect your theming).





  • lucastoLinux@lemmy.mlSo, why *should* GNOME support server side decorations?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Since when did CSD become accepted, let alone encouraged? Titlebars should only ever be drawn by the system. This trend of individual applications drawing their own titlebars is a disaster that results in fragmentation and inconsistent behaviour. The absolute disaster that is the titlebars is one of the main reasons I cannot bring myself to use GNOME, recently.





  • lucastoTechnology@beehaw.orgDon't call it a Substack
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Possible counterpoint: their use as a generic is isolated within the US (maybe some other countries, but certainly not universal), whereas ‘google’ has arguably become a pretty global term (at least in the Anglophone world, and I believe in some other languages, too), so the reach is very different in scope.

    (e.g. Despite Kleenex still a big brand in the UK, nobody uses it as a generic. The product is called a ‘tissue’)