• OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Well, that would be up to the constitution and the bill of rights … which I’m not quite done drafting yet.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I will only vote for this constitutional if it explicitly enshrines the write to the private ownership of alligators in any quantity, with exceptions for explicit standards of cruelty to alligators, which also must be written into the constitution explicitly. There should also be some language that states a dozen different ways that “alligator” isn’t some metaphor for government power, and that we’re talking about the literal animal here.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yeah … not likely, lol. It’s already way too long, what with me trying to exclude every loophole and account for every edge case, so I’m trying to keep it more general and let the Senate pass their own laws when it comes to very specific things that aren’t absolutely essential for human rights and/or the running of a fair and equitable government.

        Best of luck, though. I’ll be rooting for you to get selected for the Senate, where you can spend your entire 10-year term exclusively fighting for alligator ownership rights.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I mean, there’s ways to introduce the proper amount of crazy in fewer words. For example, such as a constitutional ban on the color yellow.