That doesn’t mean that Israel controls the actions of the US. It just means they have similar interests. If the US wasn’t fully supportive of these war crimes, they could stop providing weapons, funding, and intelligence to Israel. Hell, they could even instigate a coup and abduct Netanyahu and Ben-Gvir. Trump plays a convenient fall-guy for the empire but they won’t get rid of him so long as he’s useful. Should these wars end horribly for the capitalists in the US, getting rid of trump (likely with the epstein files as the reason) serves to reinforce people’s shared belief that the US has bad individuals, but the system itself is fine since it can remove bad individuals. No need to consider that this system creates people like Trump, then puts them into power when necessary.

Why do foreign leaders need to be pulling the strings for the US to do what it always has done? Seems like that framing is trying to deflect responsibility from the US.

The fact that you’re so avoidant of the inherent politics of the everyday world is a reaction desirable to the status quo, which is itself political. Congratulations, your kind of politics is status-quo-enjoyer which kills countless people every year for you to remain comfortable and blind to politics.

Boss makes a dollar,

I make a dime,

Ignore the hunger,

Highlight the crime

The mental image of Trump in a Miata with a 5 point harness trying to figure out stick in busy city traffic is almost good enough to let him borrow it.

Quote from the appeals court ruling from Massachusetts v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447 (1923)

It is quite obvious that the national motto and the slogan on coinage and currency ‘In God We Trust’ has nothing whatsoever to do with the establishment of religion. Its use is of patriotic or ceremonial character and bears no true resemblance to a governmental sponsorship of a religious exercise. …It is not easy to discern any religious significance attendant the payment of a bill with coin or currency on which has been imprinted ‘In God We Trust’ or the study of a government publication or document bearing that slogan. In fact, such secular uses of the motto was viewed as sacrilegious and irreverent by President Theodore Roosevelt. Yet Congress has directed such uses. While ‘ceremonial’ and ‘patriotic’ may not be particularly apt words to describe the category of the national motto, it is excluded from First Amendment significance because the motto has no theological or ritualistic impact. As stated by the Congressional report, it has ‘spiritual and psychological value’ and 'inspirational quality.”

Try to sue them if you’d like, but there’s already precedent for this argument. Like I said previously, there’s far better ways to erode public trust (though the US is doing a pretty good job of that currently with funding multiple wars while people go hungry and their medical care is stripped)

[Leviticus 19:33-34]

“When a stranger sojourns with you in your land, you shall not do him wrong. You shall treat the stranger who sojourns with you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God.

“Ummm Christians? You’ve either got to abandon your anti-immigrant stance or change the Bible. Checkmate.“

This kind of argument accomplishes nothing. Anti-immigrant Christians will ignore or double down. Changing the Bible, like changing the design of money, has been done before and will be done again.

Why would lawyers have to bypass the law to protect capital if protection of capital is the law? IP lawyers aren’t doing back-alley deals to uphold the IP law they specialized in. But even if something did slip through, it doesn’t guarantee a loss for capitalists since they can buy the outcome they want or choose the judge that they’re friends with.

Could you please form your own arguments without using an LLM? Like what is your goal here? Is it just to make people see the lies of empire? There are better examples of that (not that giving people historical examples of the empires lies actually changes their minds about things if they’re comfortable with the status quo) Lies are an everyday occurrence in our government. Spending legal fees, time, and energy just for a pointed finger and a “Ha! Gotcha! Now you have to change your money!” doesn’t seem preferable to just changing the system itself without the help of the bourgeois legal system.

Yes, I know how the fictitious movie ends and the logic it uses to get there. But maybe actual lawyers know the law better than movie script writers or the hallucinating LLM you’re using.

The entire foundation of capitalism is based on property ownership. You think capitalists would slap their foreheads and simultaneously say “oh jeez we made an oopsie putting that line on our money and now we have to get rid of the foundational aspect to all our wealth and power. Guess there’s nothing we can do about it- bribing judges for outcomes that benefit us is something we’d never think of doing with our untold riches.”?

They’d abandon religion before they abandon property ownership. We’d be forced to swap all our dollars to UsCoin or whatever cryptocurrency if a court case ever were to threaten capital (which it wouldn’t because the basis itself is dubious).

I haven’t seen the 1947 miracle on 34th street, but I have seen the remake, which changed the ending a bit.

Instead of a letter from the post office, a dollar bill is handed to the judge. The highlighted phrase “in god we trust” on that dollar keeps Santa from going to jail with the argument “if the us government can believe in god, it could also believe in Santa Claus”

Someone got their law degree from the movie Miracle on 34th Street

This is probably not exactly what you’re looking for, but I rode across the USA (4200 miles across 12 weeks) about a decade ago and this is what I did:

I used an ancient kindle to display my pdf route/cue sheet from a clear pouch on a handlebar bag that I could easily read and “flip through” while riding. (You can also just use paper) The battery life lasted long enough to get through every week of campsites where power isn’t promised. We’d stop at a hotel about once a week just to have a nice shower and charge our things. Of course I also had a full set of maps as well, but they are more difficult to read while you’re riding- thus route/cue sheet.

I had my phone and would use GPS if I feel like I got lost. I didn’t have great service in large patches of the route, but the gps works regardless, so as long as you have the GPX files, it should point you in the right direction.

I also have a SON hub dynamo that lead to a Sinewave Cycles Revolution USB charger (there’s probably more modern USB chargers you can buy nowadays). But with that I charged a usb power bank and was able to charge my phone every night.

I’d also be interested if there exists a singular device like that that is able to last a long time on a tour. Good luck and have fun on the road!!

Back in the day, Avid (the company that makes professional software like media composer and pro tools) sold a NAS system called ISIS (Infinitely Scalable Intelligent Storage). The studio I worked at had a different system, but the head of post production still called it “the ISIS” because he got used to calling the network storage that.

HonDashi. I add it to nearly all my soup stocks (unless I’m trying to make a dish vegetarian).

And now for the final question of our game which always pertains to real life skills. Buzz in if you can find the incorrect part of this statement: “Developing an accurate view of the world is difficult if you don’t have a method to verify information. One surefire way to know what’s going on thousands of miles away is to trust anonymous sources and NGOs at their word when they tell you through western mass media and without any proof that our adversaries are doing evil things.”

But it’s because I know how much better things could be if humans could simply work together.

Yes, this is what socialism is going to achieve! Hop on board. If you know things could be better and this current system incentivizes destructive competition rather than working together, wouldn’t it make sense to think that a system that incentivizes cooperation leads to more cooperation as a default?

I’ve seen, in times of great crisis, people work together and help each other out even without being prompted or rewarded. But when the system is working normally, when people are going about their day-to-day, they might ignore a stranger in need or participate in convenient routines like fast food that harm the environment. I’m not arguing for us to be in a great crisis constantly, but it shows that people are hungry for connection and cooperation; it’s just the system that alienates people and ignores consequences caused by its existence. Capitalism isn’t an inevitability just as the divine right of kings wasn’t.

but I’ve seen time and time again that that’s not going to happen.

Yes, capitalists make sure to stop cooperation and self-reliance any chance they can get. They bomb and starve the solution to convince people that the solution doesn’t exist or isn’t viable. This doesn’t make socialism less of a solution.

So do you believe humans are, at their core and regardless of system, predisposed to destroy the planet?

Taking this frame of thinking to its inevitable end, you’re either going to mow down as many people as a first step towards omnicide or you’ve given up and you’re resigned with the destruction of the world, proving to yourself that if you aren’t willing to do something to “improve” things, it must be human nature. This is obviously not me saying to go do an omnicide, but your blackpilled frame of thinking is self-enforcing. If you felt like there was a better solution out there and that socialism was a direction towards less destruction such that generations after us could keep moving towards something better, you’d be able to help build it, but you don’t, so you are chained to your doom, determined to chain us with you. The handful of capitalists busy fucking the world thank you for giving up.

I’ve been in the process of making a powerpoint-esque presentation to show to my friends who haven’t read any theory and the thought of framing and organizing it as “bitter pills” is super exciting to me. Starting out the presentation with definitions and history would’ve made them fall asleep.

I’m convinced (based off interactions I’ve had on NextDoor) a lot of people think capitalism=uses money. But also that socialism/communism=failed/corrupted capitalism. China looking better than the USA nowadays means they have to be capitalist since they obviously aren’t failing.

I just want to know if pineapple is poisonous for my dog. I don’t need paragraphs upon paragraphs of slop about what a dog is, what poison is, what a pineapple is, a hallucinated history lesson on how dogs came to be, the nutritional benefits of fruits in general, then ending off with how apples are not only safe for humans to eat, but they are delicious as well.

Send these websites to the shadow realm.