

TOTALLY NORMAL.
WE’VE ALL HAD HOLIDAYS LIKE THAT.
TOTALLY REGULAR URGE TO KEEP THE PENISES OF ROADKILL FOR CLOSER STUDY LATER.


TOTALLY NORMAL.
WE’VE ALL HAD HOLIDAYS LIKE THAT.
TOTALLY REGULAR URGE TO KEEP THE PENISES OF ROADKILL FOR CLOSER STUDY LATER.


I’m not sure I should google that.
GBE: Monster Hard Snake
I don’t think you read behind my graphic detail spoiler, or you just claimed the equivalent of kissing you without your consent was just as bad as raping you, because they key point is consent. Incorrect. It is you who have missed the point. Kissing people without consent is not in any sense ok, but also trying to make out that my great aunt is a rapist because I never wanted the kisses trivialises rape and is not ok.
Username checks out.
Thank you for the suggestion, but I’m sure that my wife and two daughters would be surprised that James came inside the house after pub night, and also that any subsequent trouser truncheon touting would have extreme consequences for us all.
I wrote a longer answer which I think I was wise to delete.
Not like that. Never like that.


Well, according to the chart and your username, it’s Monster Sword Pussy Sex Machine.


For my username(s): GirthyWand. Alternatively: Sex knob | Giant hammer.
Amusingly, my wife’s maiden name was Love Flute, which suits her, and now she’s Love Pole. Of course I’m not going to tell her either of these names.
No, I don’t think so. Not me and my friends. And not where we drink.
I mean, I have no direct experimental evidence for that assertion because I don’t think I’ve ever discussed circumcision in a bar, but I’m really very confident that none of my drinking pals are ever going to whip out their todger at the pub. And I’m not going to either. Nope.
I get where you’re coming from, and I absolutely don’t want to minimise anyone’s pain, but circumcision is not really equivalent to FGM in terms of consequences.
Often FGM includes removal of the clitoris and some of the vulva, leaving girls with a tiny aperture sealed with scar tissue requiring new fully torn flesh to achieve penetration, and girls and women who have been mutilated in this way are usually unable to feel any pleasure during sex, only pain. FGM much more like having the whole glans chopped off and half of the two sides of the wound sewn together than it is like male circumcision.
Feel very free to firmly oppose circumcision, but please don’t suggest that FGM is the same. It really really really isn’t. It’s very very different in what’s removed, very very different in how much ongoing pain it causes, very very different in the effect on sensation, and it’s not equivalent.
It’s like suggesting that it’s not fair that people treat cars running into people so much seriously than bikes running into people, except everyone, whether they ride a bicycle or a car, can see how incorrect that is, whereas a vast number of prior have no idea how brutal FGM is, which is how you end up with people claiming circumcision is just as bad. I mean, don’t get me wrong. It’s bad. But it’s in a whole different level and world of consequences for the girl than for the boy.


Turns out deporting a bunch of people with a different shade of skin or a different accent didn’t make everyone left behind richer.
All the money still goes to the multinational corporations who don’t pay their taxes, the CEOs who are shielded from taxes, the shareholders who pay less taxes and the private equity investors who borrow big to buy companies then somehow magically transfer that debt to the company, and who also get a big tax discount compared to those of us who earn our money.
Turns out it was never the immigrants making Americans poor in the first place. Who knew?!
I wandered in the fediverse
To brighten up my day;
I found a funny story where
A turd won’t flush away.
It made me laugh, it made me cry:
The cleaner had to watch him try,
But while she gazed, it was then proved
The crap was easily removed.
And senseless, she would think it was
For her to have to see, because
His Swedish language really was
Quite useless, and we see that it
Did not explain this hapless git
Or why he showed her this big shit.
So mystified she still will be
And puzzzled for eternity:
This stranger and the giant poo
He weirdly showed her in the loo.
I laughed and chuckled, then I see
The person posting next to me -
A Poem_for_your_sprog is here!
A legend! - wow! - from yesteryear!
I’ll take this chance to tell you how
Your random poems, then and now,
Have brought me joy. And that is why,
Without help from LLMs, I
Have tried to say in silly rhymes
A thank you for the happy times
You’ve brought me.
What must she think?! 🤣
Thank you so much for my best laugh in a long while.
Oh yes!
You won the internet today.
Fantastic post.


Every professional developer with actual training and actual proper tooling can confirm that they
arefeel indeed tremendously more productive.
ftfy


Congratulations on responding to the first paragraph of his post. https://lemmy.world/post/44873477/23080810 (The one that made you super cross. Sure nothing from your sandbox ever makes it into production. Great. Very wise and very careful.)
No congratulations on responding to any of the rest of what I said.


Small dogs often feel intimidated and react to that with fear and aggression. They need good, strong training from owners who exude calm and provide reassuring safety around larger dogs if they’re not to live up to the stereotype of yappy snarly little anxious furballs of anger.


Ah yes, lovely mcp. Lovely anthropic mcp. Make sure you give anthropic lots of money and use their tools and then you’ll be completely safe plugging the output of the llm into the os. Definitely fine yes.
I bet you your contract with them says they’re not liable for shit their llm does to your files, your environment or your repositories, mcp or no mcp.
Fool.


You’ll be the 4753rd guy with the oops my llm trashed my setup and disobeyed my explicit rules for keeping it in check.
You know programmers who use llms believe they’re much more productive because they keep getting that dopamine hit, but when you actually measure it, they’re slower by about 20%.
You appointed yourself boss over a fast and plausible intern who pastes and edits a LOT of stack overflow code, but never really understands it and absolutely is incapable of learning. You either spend almost all of your time in code review now for your stupid sycophantic llm interns who always tell you you’re right but never learn from you, or you’re checking in vast quantities of shit to your projects.
You know really subtle, hard to find bugs on rare cases that pass your CI every single time? Or ones that no one in their right mind would have made, but yet they compile and look right at first glance. They’re now your main type of bug. You are rotting your projects with your random number generator.
And you think that all the money you’re playing for your blagging llms protects you from them fucking up everything for you. But it doesn’t. And you’ll also find that your contract with your llm supplier expressly excludes them from any liability whatsoever arising from you using it instead pre-blaming you for trusting it.
My surname is not really “again”.