You just made me stub my toe with your words. I demand 5 million for pain & suffering because you’re civilly liable. You can sue them already, but is very unlikely you’ll win because they have user agreements and disclaimers, and people are supposed to have some common sense. What does being civilly liable mean to you?

Do you think if we could offer up Trump, Vance, Kegbreath, Miller, Rubio, Nutlick, Hitleryahu, & Ben-Gvir in exchange for a peace agreement, that Iran would accept our offering?

What is this X now? You can’t actually comment with anything of substance, or you know doing so would expose you for what you project?

All you’re doing is enabling and promoting systematic corruption by using Trump to set your expectations. We need out of abusive toxic relationships, not simply look for one that is a little less toxic.

No one controls “the” AI . There are many types of AI. There are competing interests domestic & foreign. So no single corporation owns or controls “the” AI. I don’t disagree that some have significantly more influence over what is accessible to the general public, especially using hosted providers, but there are many people who run their own locally as well. I just believe a centralized government significantly controlling the cans and cants is much worse, just as if the government were to control what cryptography algorithms people can use.

Ah yes, everyone else is stupid & they need a corporate-owned centralized government controlling any information they may speak or receive.

I mean that would be wonderful news if they weren’t immediately replaced by pro-capitalism corporate Democrats owned by AIPAC.

No, they tell on themselves all the time.

First, it is common knowledge that you shouldn’t inherently trust AI as a definitive source of truth right now, especially for critical matters. Almost every major AI tool explicitly puts this in their usage agreement and displays persistent UI disclaimers warning users not to trust the output and to consult actual professionals.

AI is not inherently good or bad though. It is just a tool. Good people use it to build things and solve problems, and stubborn people use it to validate their own terrible decisions. There is a deeply ingrained luddite nostalgia here that equates new technology with moral decay, confusing a valid hatred for unchecked tech-bro capitalism with a hatred for the actual math and code.

Blaming AI because a stubborn, arrogant guy went hunting for something to validate his refusal of medical treatment is misdirection. There is good justification for transparency & safeguards around climate impact, resource consumption & the establishment class that do bad things with it. Like when Israel used it to carry out genocide that the Democrats funded & voted for. Likewise in Germany, the liberal establishment has criminalized saying things like “from the river to the sea” to crush dissent by people wanting Palestinians to be free from apartheid.

The idea that people shouldn’t have autonomy & everything needs to be locked down to protect them relies on the deeply infantilizing premise that adults are so intellectually fragile that simply reading an AI hallucination, or a viewpoint you disagree with, is too dangerous for the mind to process.

Sounds like time for Grandpa to go in a nursing home. No shortage of bad information out there. Just waiting for the day for liberals in the US to finally admit they want to burn books, ban free speech & go back to the 1930s.

Utah & Idaho too. Don’t forget about the Mormons.

Can we just use Trump & Netanyahu interchangeably at this point? Netanyahu’s fist is so far up his ass, might as well refer to the puppet master by name.

At this point when American soldiers come home in caskets people need to be celebrating that they didn’t get to murder more children. If their wives or husbands are sad, we need to remind them that their spouse died serving Israel & that they are better off not grieving over someone who is in hell now.

Trump is awful, but a significant majority of their deaths happened when Biden was funding & supporting it.

Are you seriously that dumb? She said her commitment to Israel is unwaivering & that she supports taking whatever action is necessary against Iran. She said poor Israelis only killed 20k kids but they’re the victims.

https://www.c-span.org/clip/public-affairs-event/user-clip-vice-president-harris-on-iranian-missile-attack-in-israel/5166117

No, it is you that supports authoritarian & fascism. You voted for an ardent apartheid supporter.

Israel never honors ceasefires. The country was founded by and for eugenic imperialists

But I’m told everyday by mainstream media here in the US that we’re winning & that the stock market is doing great

She certainly talked about attacking Iran and was praising the biggest war criminal of the last two decades, Dick Cheney. I don’t think she would have been as bad globally, but that’s not how it works. If you can’t say no to genocide then you don’t get to claim to be the victim.

It certainly has exposed how weak Democrats are

Not as dumb as Kamala Cheney