Ah, kannte ich nicht. Danke!

Trainspotting? Verstehe den Witz irgendwie nicht. Oder geht es hier um den Frankfurter Bahnhofsviertel?

Thanks!

Being livid is one thing, stabbing someone is an entirely different story… Let’s just hope it’s actually hyperbole.

I have an app on my phone with permission to display on top of other apps that draws a line around the camera cut out showing the battery charge level no matter what I am doing on the phone. In some older phone with no cutout I used to have a horizontal line in the top of the screen.

Which app is that? Looking for a better solution for that myself (on Android).

I think if a face stabbing is the result of doing something like that you have more serious problems…

Because of this incident, the Dutch authorities now ban electronic greeting cards, which, unlike packages, weren’t x-rayed before being brought on the ship.

Who the fuck thought it was a good idea to allow unchecked electronics into a sensitive area like a navy ship?

C’mon guys, they bought it used, they saved taxpayers a ton of money! /s

IMO it’s more how and mostly why they’re dealing with whatever it is. Is the person ignoring any advice to the contrary and not accepting any proper conversation about it? He’s stubborn. Is the person listening to what he’s being told, possibly adjusting his methods, but staying on the goal, where the goal is still sensible? Determined.

Mind you, someone who doesn’t like what the determined person is doing, even if it is right, might falsely say he’s stubborn, with the goal of discrediting what he’s doing, and someone who’s stubborn will paint himself as determined in order to boost the image of what he’s doing, so I understand where the thought comes from.

I don’t know specifically, but here are a couple of possibilities, also being charitable to Magyar and assuming no invitation was made:

• He is trying to not agitate things too much with Netanyahu, hoping to achieve something through back channels. Often diplomacy, especially in this day and age, involves not being too brash publicly to avoid anything that could disrupt something happening behind the curtains. Often times only sticks don’t work, you need carrots as well.

• Netanyahu is constantly preaching that Israel is constantly under attack, is the underdog, is never regarded, etc., which is often used to distract from or even support the atrocities being committed. Magyar possibly doesn’t want to support that narrative. An explicit denial of an invitation can be used to say “see how nasty they are with us”, which can be in turn used to rally Netanyahu’s supporters or even those more extreme than him (thinking of the likes of Gvir). If you avoid feeding that narrative and give something like this (maybe with a little “nudge nudge wink wink”), maybe that can avoid the heat going up any further while still showing those who are more level headed that no, there was no invitation.

• There’s an argument to be made to ignore false statements instead of responding to them directly. Depending on who you talk to, responding to statements can give them a certain legitimacy. Think of a (maybe too) similar situation: a fascist makes a statement that is flat out false, like “immigration is causing a crime wave”. You can respond to that statement, explain how it’s false, etc., but since you’re responding to that statement, you are inevitably also mentioning that statement, potentially spreading it further, and generally giving it more air. Or you can ignore that statement in hopes of suffocating it. While I generally tend to the former approach myself, there is an argument to be made for the latter approach.

Not saying I’m a fan of Magyar (I’m not, even if he is much better than Orban), agree with his decision or am completely convinced there was no invitation, but there definitely are plausible scenarios where there is a solid reasoning behind this.

Maybe they want vacationers to leave their work phones at home lol

Schwarzenegger reportedly told customs officials that he was planning to auction the watch for a good cause

That’s the key here. He was importing it. When you’re bringing multiple phones and laptops, you’re bringing them back with you, that’s a whole different story.

Thanks!

no spam possible

Only contacts can message you. Yes, it technically almost eliminates the possibility of spam, but it also means you explicitly have to exchange data first. So, no “here’s my email address, you can send it to me there”, no “do you have XYZ’s address”, no “I lost access to my previous address, this is my new one”. I realize all of these scenarios can be seen as risks, but they’re still important in day to day life and will be a major hindrance to adoption.

Source? Heard this before and not surprised, but I’d like something concrete that I can point to.

The General actually first bombed at the box office, leading to Buster Keaton being much more restricted in what he could do. Only later did it become a classic, deservedly so.

The one on the right never happened, though, the artist was trying to shock people with exactly which two people are kissing

Not a full meal per se, but my mother would sometimes saute spinach and mushrooms in butter and red wine (plus probably garlic), if I remember correctly. It was pretty fucking good.

So viel, wie aktuell scheiße läuft bei der DB: der Betriebsrat hat in aller Regel ein ziemlich guter Blick auf sowas, ich hab da (ausnahmsweise) ziemliches Vertrauen.

Mainly downloading videos via yt-dlp