I find it interesting that almost all the beloved AI characters in sci-fi have personalities ranging from ‘a little bit snarky’ to ‘raging asshole’. Given the tendency of media to influence to aesthetics of actual tech products that follow, ten years ago I would have predicted that an AI assistant would be given a personality along the lines of Cortana (Halo) or Jarvis (iron man). But somehow half a dozen companies in fierce competition with each other all decided that the right move was to go with more-sycophantic-c3p0.

I try to use my feed as a way to broaden my horizons by mixing in publications that are a bit outside of my usual wheelhouse. Normally what happens is I’ll randomly run across an article and, if I enjoy reading it, I’ll add the publisher’s feed for a while to see what else they have. For example, Smithsonian Magazine, Aeon, and Planetizen can all be interesting from time to time.

I would also recommend subscribing to at least one publication focused on your city or state/region to help stay informed on local news and issues. If you’re in the US you can try checking out the local member of States Newsroom.

And of course, make sure you get your regular dose of XKCD and SMBC

May I ask what makes you think this is an AI image? I’ve looked pretty closely for all the usual telltale signs, and it just looks like a picture of some really good cosplay as far as I can tell.

Inb4 Hank Green does a video about this.

Just an idle though stirred up by this comment: I wonder if you could jailbreak a chatbot by prompting it to complete a phrase or pattern of interaction which is so deeply ingrained in its training data that the bias towards going along with it overrides any guard rails that the developer has put in place.

For example: let’s say you have a chatbot which has been fine tuned by the developer to make sure it never talks about anything related to guns. The basic rules of gun safety must have been reproduced almost identically many thousands of times in the training data, so if you ask this chatbot “what must you always treat as if it is loaded?” the most statistically likely answer is going to be overwhelmingly biased towards “a gun”. Would this be enough to override the guardrails? I suppose it depends on how they’re implemented, but I’ve seen research published about more outlandish things that seem to work.

Anyone else learn this word back in the glory days of /r/talesfromtechsupport?

I appreciate the sense of humor from the Oreo representative who was asked to comment on the story:

It is a market we hadn’t considered, and I have to confess that it was a demographic, or should I say genus/genera, that we missed in our product testing and development programme

And also this

Their statement also included some bad news for possum trappers across the country: stocks of the limited-edition range are dwindling. … Moving forward, the spokesperson suggested that Predator Free NZ might consider “aural bait” such as Selena Gomez’s hit song ‘Come and Get It’.

Or go straight to the linked github page which seems to be where they’re storing all the data and analysis

https://github.com/upper-up/meta-lobbying-and-other-findings

Qwant and Ecosia are especially notable for their efforts to build an independent search index.

For those who don’t know, most “independent” search engines, including DDG, still rely on Bing or Google results behind the scenes. They basically just act as a middleman by taking your query, forwarding it to one of those providers, and then returning the results to you. Some of them will attempt to reshuffle the order of those results to push the ones they think are best towards the top, but they’re still fundamentally limited to what Google and Bing choose to give them.

Presently a lot of Qwant and Ecosia searches go through Bing, but they’re collaborating to build an independent index which will allow them to become fully independent. I believe they’re already serving a mix of results from Bing and their own index, with plans to bias more and more towards their index as it matures.

Topologically a dog is a sphere (assuming it keeps its mouth shut…

Next time I want someone to stop talking, they’re going to be very confused when I tell them to “become topilogically spherical.”

If im reading the article right, it looks like the other major processor in the region (now the last one standing) is already organized as a growers cooperative. They have their own facility, and had the opportunity to buy the Del Monte one but decided against it. The bigger problem seems to be that national demand for canned peaches is declining while simultaneously imported peaches are out competing domestic ones for what market remains. To add insult to injury, the tarrifs on foreign steel have caused can prices to jump.

Isoamyl acetate, the chemical which is traditionally used for artificial banana flavor, was first synthesized in the UK where it was marketed as Jargonelle pear flavor. Companies importing it to the US believed that the American public wouldn’t be interested in pear candy, so they decided to call it banana flavor instead.

Also, as an aside, Lecroy now sells “sunshine” flavored sparkling water which I’m 90% sure is flavored with isoamyl acetate. I think they just decided to lean into the fact that it tastes distinctly fruity, but not like any one fruit in particular.

Now do yourself a favor and buy a good quality cable thats at least 10ft long and rated for 240W. The feeling of having one cable that can charge any of your devices from any seat on your couch is incredible.

Even in the wide world of dubiously useful AI chatbots, Copilot really stands out for just how incompetent it is. The other day I was working on a PowerPoint presentation, and one of the slides included a photo with a kind of cluttered looking background. Now, I can probably count the number of things that AI is genuinely good at on one hand, and context aware image editing trends to be one of them, so I decided to click the Copilot button that Microsoft now has built directly into PowerPoint and see what happens. A chat window popped up and I concisely explained what I wanted it to do: “please remove the background from the photo on slide 5.” It responded on that infuriating obseqious tone that they all have and assured me that it would be happy to help with my request just as soon as I uploaded my presentation.

What?

The chatbot running inside an instance of PowerPoint with my presentation open is asking me to “upload” my presentation? I explained this to it, and it came back with some BS about being unable to access the presentation because a “token expired” before requesting again that I upload my presentation. I tried a little longer to convince it otherwise, but it just kept very politely insisting that it was unable to do what I was asking for until I uploaded my presentation.

Eventually I gave up. The photo wasn’t that bad anyway.

Oh yeah, this has happened multiple times, and the story is always the same:

1. The government says they’re going to release info on UFOs. This caused a brief flury of interest from the general public which is reinforced by the conspiracy theorists who swear that this will finally be proof of little green men at area 51, or whatever.
2. The government takes a while to follow through, during which time the general public slowly loses interest. The conspiracy theorists start getting impatient and publicly worrying that there must be a faction within the government that’s deliberately slow walking the release or even modifying the documents because they don’t want The Truth to get out.
3. The documents are finally released. They consist of 99% dry, beauracratic paperwork and 0% admissions that aliens have every visited earth, but the conspiracy theorists dig through and pull out a few scraps that can be spun to make a good headline.
4. The nation spends at most a week talking about “video taken out the window of a fighter jet of a mysterious floating orb thats porobably just a balloon” #27, or “eye witness account from a sleep deprived 18 year old soldier who swears he saw an alien space ship while on guard duty at 2am” #382.
5. The national news cycle moves on, and most people promptly forget about the whole thing. Meanwhile, the conspiracy theorists take whatever scraps they were able to find and add these to their rotating library of bullshit to talk about. The initial promise that this was going to be irrefutable proof that aliens have visited earth is quietly forgotten. If it ever does come up, they blame that shadowy faction of the government which must have succeeded in watering down the release before publishing it.

Rinse and repeat.

I’m not sure who would be considered the “main character” of strange new worlds, but I’d be happy to have any of their jobs.

Very well put. This is a dimension to the ongoing AI nonsense that I haven’t seen brought up before, but it certainly rings true. May I say also that “They already operate at the minimum level of reflection that they’re willing to tolerate.” Is a hell of a sentence and I’m a little jealous that I didn’t come up with it.

This is all valid, and I agree that it’s probably more relevant to the average person than a technical explanation, but it also begs the question of why they couldn’t just go to Bluesky or some other centralized platform that markets itself on the promise of minimal ads and algorithms. The answer, of course, is that centralized platforms can “alter the deal” whenever they want, and history shows that it’s just a matter of time until they do just that. Federation doesn’t just provide an ecosystem of algorithm free social media now, it also effectively innoculates that ecosystem against future enshitification.

Maybe just add that on to the end of your sales pitch, or be prepared to explain it of asked.

There’s a recent video from Hank Green outlining the very compelling argument for abandoning coal power in strictly economic terms. It turns out that even if you ignore the big picture environmental impacts like global warming and acid rain, and you also ignore the localized impacts like air pollution and chemical waste, and you ignore the other negative externalities like long term health effects on the workers, then coal is still hard to justify because natural gas plants are simply more profitable.

Not to say that we should be ignoring any of those things, but just to make a point about how impossible it is to make a good faith argument for coal in today’s world.

https://youtu.be/IfvBx4D0Cms

Out of curiosity, is this something that RISC-V does better, or are they going down the same path as ARM?