

When you see this phrasing in English language, ‘it’ refers to the main subject of the preceding statement. In this case as a reply to the main post the subject is the “$322 Million Spotify Piracy Case”.


When you see this phrasing in English language, ‘it’ refers to the main subject of the preceding statement. In this case as a reply to the main post the subject is the “$322 Million Spotify Piracy Case”.


This has been in motion since before AI was being pushed in everything.
Same as you would download anything else.


I’ve heard that coconut coir can be very absorbent.


I’m not sure what you’re buying, but I prioritize purchases of things I will actually own and therefore do own most of the things I buy.


These companies maintain that even though you possess a PDF, you still do not own it and do not have the rights associated with ownership.
Is it that universal though? I know it was 40 years ago now, but when management overrode engineers to sign off on the disastrous launch of the Space Shuttle Challenger, I don’t think they faced any legal consequences.
You’re not alone
IMO if your survival depends on doing a ‘job’ (especially if you’re employed by someone else), then it’s better to look for fulfilment in your personal life and realize the job is a means to survive and hopefully also fund what you really want to do for yourself and your loved ones.
Work to live, not live to work.
It’s open source - literally the opposite of black box.


It might also be from oxidation. There are a lot of ways that can happen, even directly through the walls of the tubing between the kegs and faucets if it’s the cheap kind.


Also be cognizant that in that scenario you would have benefitted greatly from a system which does immense harm to a subset of the population by exploiting addiction.


You gotta love how getting suggested content they don’t like from the recommendation engine means they’re a victim.
Right? Why not just let the user position it where they want it? This seems like it can only be nefarious.


Email has been a decentralized federated system from the start, though I’m not aware of any community I’d trust to be a more privacy-respecting host than the available commercial offerings.


Our legal entity is in Sweden, where the law does not allow for any government to force us to spy on our users.
You’ll agree that Proton doing better would require them to move to a different country, right?
Also Mullvad doesn’t offer email accounts, does it? Seems that they couldn’t have a ‘no user data’ policy if they did since the emails would be exactly that.


You don’t have only those two choices. Be brave and support non-fire even if a majority isn’t yet. Be part of the solution and don’t believe the lies that better options aren’t real.


the LNT model isn’t actually used there at all.
But it is in use at plants in the US as it’s built in right from planning before construction even begins, because LNT has thoroughly influenced legal and regulatory requirements.


Firstly, you should say please when you’re asking for something.
The claim was made as if they know exactly the materials the thugs’ gaiters are made of. Unless they are an insider of that group, it’s way too presumptuous.
Common natural or synthetic fabrics aren’t as effective at blocking modern facial recognition as anyone might assume.
Here’s a couple examples of someone putting in a bit of effort to actually test both common and purpose-built products against facial recognition.
I want to see copilot directly control a big cnc machine. Might be entertaining.