

The co2 used is a fixed amount that resides in a closed loop and never gets released to make the battery work.
Try not to make a fool of yourself next time or you’ll damage the ideals you are fighting for.
“I do not worship what you worship, nor do you worship what I worship. I do not venerate what you venerate, nor do you venerate what I venerate.”
“You will pay dearly, you will pay everything.”
“The moving finger writes; and, having writ, moves on: nor all thy piety nor wit shall lure it back to cancel half a line, nor all thy tears wash out a word of it.”
“Smile and the world smiles with you, cry and you cry alone.”
“I would rather die on my feet than live on my knees.”
“Better to be a number than the number one like many.”


The co2 used is a fixed amount that resides in a closed loop and never gets released to make the battery work.
Try not to make a fool of yourself next time or you’ll damage the ideals you are fighting for.


That’s not exactly what Lecun said, he simply was criticizing the commercial approach of Meta and the lack of research. He himself thinks he can do more with just a different approach, not “unknown” tech.
Meta, however, is only one of the companies working on it and they seem considerably behind competition currently.
People complaining that things crash is in fact very anecdotal and, even if it was true, LLMs being not that good yet isn’t news and we aren’t talking about that.
Same goes for the fact that LLMs aren’t anywhere close to AGI, like marketing teams try to pretend.
On the other hand though, I have heard university professors saying that coding through LLMs is improving constantly and so rapidly that they think it is very likely that they will become widely used tools even for professional programmers in the near future.
The time saving is game changing for any such activity.
Should be also noted that we are seeing big improvements in time frames of months and LLMs have been “mainstream” for not that long yet. It’s so early to say what can or cannot be achieved in my opinion.
Lastly, I’m not saying the bubble won’t pop. If I had to make a prediction the bubble will pop, some companies will burn to the ground but some others won’t because they were playing a different game the whole time (Google is the first example that comes to mind), which is why I think it won’t be the catharsis every anti-AI person is waiting for.
As for AGI, I would dare to say that we’ll get there too, but it’s a useless prediction with no value.


Why should they hide if AI companies are doing it too and even profiting from it without repercussions?


News headlines in my country are like “Spotify attacked!!”, “Millions of music tracks stolen!!”.
Hilarious…


The article also mentions that they can deflate it in around 10 hours


Sounds pretty good
this community has the lowest imaginable amount of people who get a joke
This would be a more accurate depiction

Ok boomer.


Is it though?
I genuinely fear you all waiting for that supreme bubble burst will be either left waiting or be extremely disappointed when it happens.
Time will tell I guess.
So you basically took a class in finding things offensive?
I am just acknowledging that the poster is continuing the ouroboros of being offended.
Do you want to join them?
It’s funny because it’s true, as they say.


Source: trust me bro
“I’m not offended”
proceeds to write wall of text about how it should be offensive
Considering this particular work of art racist though, it’s being offended by it.
There is nothing actually racist about it, I could even argue it’s the opposite of racist, but probably it’s neither.
Whatever it is, it did its job judging by your reaction.
AHAHAHHAH that was really unexpected.
Anyway I’m not a Trumper nor a Christian, so I’ve never supported pedophiles in my life.
You should probably turn off the internet for today buddy.
Take care of yourself.
I am sorry to tell you that nowhere is “cool”. Or at least nowhere the main online services are located.
Well, Trump won’t be alive next time Russia will invade them again.