I actually really like this, and it won’t slide down your wrist or hug it too tight either

I’m getting deja Vu. I thought he said we are blockading the straight. What’s wrong with this guy

This is 100% ai

Do you think we can trick him into taxing churches

I have some weirdly backed in “opinions”

But they’ve been mixed in with facts. So it’s getting hard to tell when I’m being obnoxious or correct

Although this is stupid you wouldn’t believe the amount of people I work with who are “highly educated” who just have the worst work process / ideas / work ethic.

The past two years of my life working in corporate has dramatically changed my overall views on average human intelligence.

Oh no… anyway

I use it for tedious transformations or needle ones haystack problems.

They are better at searching for themes or concepts then they are at actually doing any “thinking tasks”. My rule is that if requires a lot of critical thinking then the LLM can do it.

It’s definitely not all they say it is. I think LLMs will fundamentally always have these problems.

I’ve actually had a much better time using it for in line completion as if recent. It’s much better when the scope of the problem it needs to “solve” ( the code it needs to find and compose to complete your line ) is like the Goldilocks zone. And if the answer it gives is bad I just keep typing.

I really hate the way LLM vibe coded slop is written and architecture. To me is clear these things have extremely limited conception. I’ve compared it to essentially ripping out the human language center, giving it a keyboard and asking it to program for you. It’s just no really what it’s good at.

I knew the original heist was a marketing scheme but this just proves it

YSK, there’s a large number of older Kindles that can be jail broken.

I just ssh pirated .mobi files into mine

I order you to restructure your car by ripping out your car tires and putting them on your trunk :)

See the point of the article now?

Is he threating nuclear war???

It’s all I see slop enthusiasts go off of

I’m terrified I’ll never be able to find somewhere to work where this isn’t the case. Deeply terrified.

On the one hand software freedom.

On the other this has me thinking about how fascinating this problem is from academic standpoint.

How can you ensure software can ONLY run on the machines you allow? Even if the user has ring 0 access?

Is it mathematically impossible to achieve?

Any question that you could get the answer too from reading a sentence or two from a book or article is generally an LLM will probably be able to answer.

It’s good for surface level exploratory research.

The deeper you go the more fallacies and bias start to enter the mix. LLMs by nature are biased and will only present you with one or two solutions/options/opinions on why and what.

Knowing when your hitting that point is difficult. I urge you to read documentation and human written guides and articles once you find yourself surprising what the LLM can give you.

As a software developer and script writer myself I can guarantee you what a LLM writes is not “gold” it’s more like bronze at best.

It’s double speak.

People learned the power of words and now they are abusing them.

The American public with all their faults will nearly trust any written word. Anything besides what they’ve already been programmed to immediately be skeptical of they will readily accept into their reality like good little consumers.

They are easy and effective

It’s ok for very furnace level exploration. Like 100 level stuff. If it’s something you’d google and easily find in an article it’s likely to do a ok job.

I’ve also found it’s good for tedious straightforward tasks. Anything that would be uncomfortable or timely or automate manually. Best for one offs.

I’ve also found it’s extremly good for translation, which was it’s originally use.