Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 5 months ago
At a Senate Commerce Committee hearing before the Congressional recess, Sen. Ben Ray Luján (D-NM) countered President Trump’s nominee for National Highway Traffic Safety Administrator Jonathan Morrison’s accusation that a technology to detect impaired driving was covertly included in a bipartisan bill.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Senator Lujan. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Here's a thought, Mr. Morrison. Why don't you just
00:04eliminate seat belts from cars, eliminate backup cameras from cars. Hell, stop making them out of
00:10metal. Make them out of plastic, and let's find the cheapest car that we can sell to the American
00:15people. We'll modernize the fleet, and more people will die. I don't know if my colleagues know this,
00:21but there was not a provision snuck into a piece of legislation that's going to save people's lives
00:27in America. You and I met. I asked the same questions to Secretary Duffy. I was surprised
00:33to learn from him that his wife also survived a horrible crash. I don't know if you know this,
00:39Senator Moreno, but I survived a head-on car collision in my early 20s when I was driving
00:44home from a basketball tournament because a guy was drunker than shit and drove right into me
00:50in front of my church, in front of the place where my grandfather is buried. I'm a person of faith like
00:54you. Somebody helped save my life that night. 10,000 people die a year in America because we
01:01want to talk about self-driving cars. Hell, I can go to states right now and jump in a cab and there's
01:06no driver. That's safe? And we can't install technology that nine auto manufacturers have
01:16already filed plans. This legislation worked. The markets are reacting. In Europe, you can already
01:22get in a car that has this technology available, not just to tell if you're drunk, but to tell
01:28if you're impaired. The technology exists. 14 tier one and tier two suppliers. Look, I'm not an auto
01:33person, but I understand that those are the folks that the major auto manufacturers work with
01:38to get technology in vehicles. They can tell if you're impaired. Hell, go to an auto show.
01:43If I sold cars, I'd go to several auto shows to see what the latest and greatest is and get in those
01:48cars. And you'd be surprised how much technology exists today. These are not the questions that I
01:54plan. But when someone is suggesting that legislation was snuck into a bipartisan bill,
02:00I don't think Rick Scott is a liberal member of this body. He was my partner. Senator Capito,
02:06who also sits on this committee, has been a driver of this legislation. I've been proud to earn the
02:12support of my colleagues from across the country to get this done. We've got to find a way to do it.
02:18So my question to you, Mr. Morrison, is this piece of legislation that is called the HALT Act,
02:25it's the honoring the Abbas family legacy to terminate drunk driving. Who lost a family member to a drunk
02:31driver? There's rules currently pending at the Department of Transportation. I'm very disappointed
02:39that under Secretary Pete Buttigieg, under President Biden, this was not finalized.
02:43It was bipartisan. We worked on it bicamerally, bipartisan in both chambers and got this done.
02:48We negotiated with the auto manufacturers. Everyone was at the table. Someone from Others
02:54Against Drunk Driving is actually in this room. I hope all of us take time to sit down with them and
02:58find out how many people are dying in our states so that we can all get behind this technology.
03:03Can I get your commitment, sir, that you will make progress on moving forward the existing rulemaking
03:10pursuant to the HALT Act?
03:13Absolutely. And as I said, when we met in your office, and I enjoyed our meeting, I thought it
03:18was a productive meeting. I'm not in the building now. It is a day one priority of mine to get in
03:23there and get a sense of the state of the technology. That's the technology that DOT has been working
03:27on for years, but not just the state of that technology, but the state of the technology that's
03:31being developed elsewhere. That is something that I appreciate. I mean, that's all we can
03:34ask for. There should be no question that existing technology works, and some people are actually
03:40driving cars that do this stuff already. It's working. Another issue that I care about deeply
03:46is ensuring that trucks have side underride guards to prevent cars, pedestrian, and bicyclists
03:51from being crushed underneath. As a result, according to NHTSA, the cost of installing side guards
03:58exceeds the benefits. Unfortunately, to reach this estimate, NHTSA makes assumptions in their
04:04cost-benefit analysis that excludes whole categories of preventable deaths of vulnerable
04:08road users, such as pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorcyclists. I don't understand that.
04:13If it's going to be studied, it should be studied. And then an answer should result based on whatever
04:19the research is. Yes or no, will you commit to counting pedestrians and bicyclists as preventable
04:24deaths for vulnerable road users and the cost-benefit analysis and any future rulemakings on side
04:30underride guards? I will work with the economists with the NHTSA to make sure that everything
04:36appropriate is being considered. I'm not familiar with that particular study that was issued, but
04:40it's something. I appreciate that. Mr. Bars, in New Mexico, we see first time the dangers that come
04:44with heavy freight traffic on highways, especially along I-40 and I-25, the two major arterials in our
04:50state, where my constituents have raised real concerns about safety. Truck crash deaths are
04:55up more than 60 percent nationwide since 2009, including nearly 5,500 lives lost just last year.
05:02What steps will you take as the administrator to make sure the FMCSA is doing everything it can do
05:08to reduce crashes and protect drivers and families on our roadways? Senator, thank you very much for
05:12the question, roadway safety being top priority for me and my career. As I mentioned in my open
05:16statement, working closely in our mix-app grants, there are law enforcement officers in your state,
05:22making sure they're doing the aggressive traffic enforcement that needs to be done.
05:27Also going and doing the inspections that need to do and try to do preventative concerns,
05:33finding those violations well before they happen so we can prevent those crashes from happening during
05:38a regular routine inspection is critical. Appreciate that. Mr. Chairman, I have other questions.
05:43I'll submit them into the record. I thank you for the time. I just hope we can find some common
05:46ground on public safety. I heard my colleagues say that that's something Democrats and Republicans
05:51agree on. Do we or don't we? It's time to put up or shut up when we get these rules in place and
05:59we're to choose to save the American people or we're not. That's what it's going to come down to,
06:02and I hope that we can find common ground to get this done. It's not easy to talk about almost dying.
06:07Sometimes things happen for a reason.
06:16And I guess that I've learned from this president, if God gives you another chance,
06:18you better do something with it, and I'll be damned if I'm not going to do something about it.
06:22Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
06:23Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
06:23Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
06:24Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
06:24Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
06:24Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
06:25Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
06:26Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
06:27Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
06:28Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
06:29Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
06:30Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
06:31Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
06:32Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
06:33Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
06:34Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
06:35Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
06:36Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
06:37Thank you for the time, Mr. Chairman.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended