Users report that InVision excels in collaborative editing with a score of 9.4, allowing teams to work simultaneously on designs, while Miro's collaborative editing features are not as highly rated, indicating a potential gap in real-time collaboration capabilities.
Reviewers mention that Miro shines in mind mapping with a score of 9.0, providing a more intuitive experience for brainstorming sessions compared to InVision's score of 8.7, which may not meet the needs of users focused on ideation.
G2 users highlight that InVision's file sharing capabilities are rated at 9.3, making it easier to distribute design files among team members, whereas Miro's file sharing is rated lower at 8.5, which could hinder seamless collaboration.
Users on G2 report that Miro offers superior feedback communication tools with a score of 9.1, allowing for better interaction and input from team members, while InVision's feedback communication is rated at 8.3, suggesting it may lack some features that enhance user engagement.
Reviewers say that InVision's user, role, and access management features are rated highly at 9.6, providing robust control over team permissions, while Miro's score of 8.2 indicates it may not offer the same level of administrative flexibility.
Users report that Miro's mobile application is rated at 7.3, which may limit usability on-the-go, while InVision's mobile app has a higher score of 8.4, suggesting a more user-friendly experience for mobile users.
Idea generation (brainstorming). Idea visualisation (emphasis on "show" rather than "tell"). Idea communication (share with team & other stakeholders). Idea...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.