InNeo-CyberneticsbyWolfgang Stegemann, Dr. phil.·2d agoHow Language Models Generate MeaningA language model can write a text whose sense is easy to grasp as we read. What exactly does the machine contribute? David Gunkel proposes…A response icon1A response icon1
InNeo-CyberneticsbyWolfgang Stegemann, Dr. phil.·Nov 6Consciousness: Are We Explaining the Phenomenon or Our Concepts?On Scientific Abstraction, Category Errors, and the Biological Genesis of ExperienceA response icon5A response icon5
InNeo-CyberneticsbyWolfgang Stegemann, Dr. phil.·Oct 26The Dualism of the Anti-DualistsThe Category Errors of 4E CognitionA response icon1A response icon1
InNeo-CyberneticsbyWolfgang Stegemann, Dr. phil.·Oct 18Consciousness Is a Vital FunctionWhy the Debate on Artificial Consciousness Begins at the Wrong End EpistemologicallyA response icon5A response icon5
InNeo-CyberneticsbyWolfgang Stegemann, Dr. phil.·Oct 11Why We Overestimate and Underestimate Artificial IntelligenceArtificial intelligence is supposed to take over our thinking, weaken our intellectual abilities, and perhaps one day seize control…A response icon9A response icon9
InNeo-CyberneticsbyWolfgang Stegemann, Dr. phil.·Oct 2What Is Consciousness?A Reconstruction in 15 Parts
InNeo-CyberneticsbyWolfgang Stegemann, Dr. phil.·Sep 25Where Enactivism Took a Wrong TurnFrom autopoiesis to cognition, meaning, and experienceA response icon2A response icon2
InNeo-CyberneticsbyWolfgang Stegemann, Dr. phil.·Sep 18The Functionalist’s TrilemmaWhy Doing the Same Thing Does Not Mean Experiencing the Same ThingA response icon3A response icon3
InNeo-CyberneticsbyWolfgang Stegemann, Dr. phil.·Sep 11Why the “Hard Problem” of Consciousness is a Trick QuestionIn my new book, I don’t try to bridge the gap between mind and matter. I show why we dug the trench ourselves.A response icon23A response icon23
InNeo-CyberneticsbyWolfgang Stegemann, Dr. phil.·Sep 4Why We Will Never Build Artificial Consciousness… for a Reason AI Research OverlooksA response icon38A response icon38
