-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
Fix Iceberg Integration tests #34686
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix Iceberg Integration tests #34686
Conversation
Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment R: @chamikaramj for label java. Available commands:
The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments). |
Let's try not to disable ITs to fix flakes and let's try to fix the test instead. Unless this is submit blocking which I don't think is the case. |
R: @Abacn |
Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control. If you'd like to restart, comment |
@@ -62,11 +62,12 @@ public static void deleteDataset() { | |||
|
|||
@Override | |||
public String tableId() { | |||
return DATASET + "." + testName.getMethodName() + "_" + SALT; | |||
return DATASET + "." + testName.getMethodName() + "_" + salt; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
@Override | |||
public Catalog createCatalog() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
since createCatalog is called in setup() which is a non-static method, salt should also be non-static member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done
|
||
private static final int NUM_SHARDS = 10; | ||
private static final int NUM_SHARDS = 1; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will this remove test coverage of sharded case? We can decrease shard / number of records on direct runner but good to keep parallelism on other runners (Dataflow)
cc: @ahmedabu98
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done
I don't think that failing tests are related to the changes in this PR |
Let me reopen the pr to re-trigger tests |
@Abacn Thanks. These 2 failures are not related to the pr changes. |
Fixes: #31931
Successul run example: https://github.com/akashorabek/beam/actions/runs/14610522701
Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:
addresses #123
), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, commentfixes #<ISSUE NUMBER>
instead.CHANGES.md
with noteworthy changes.See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.
To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md
GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)
See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.