Skip to content

Fix Iceberg Integration tests #34686

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 24, 2025

Conversation

akashorabek
Copy link
Collaborator

@akashorabek akashorabek commented Apr 20, 2025

Fixes: #31931
Successul run example: https://github.com/akashorabek/beam/actions/runs/14610522701


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

Copy link
Contributor

Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer:

R: @chamikaramj for label java.

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

@chamikaramj
Copy link
Contributor

Let's try not to disable ITs to fix flakes and let's try to fix the test instead.

Unless this is submit blocking which I don't think is the case.

@akashorabek akashorabek changed the title Skip HiveCatalogIT and BigQueryMetastoreCatalogIT in Iceberg ITs Fix Iceberg Integration tests Apr 23, 2025
@akashorabek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

R: @Abacn

Copy link
Contributor

Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control. If you'd like to restart, comment assign set of reviewers

@@ -62,11 +62,12 @@ public static void deleteDataset() {

@Override
public String tableId() {
return DATASET + "." + testName.getMethodName() + "_" + SALT;
return DATASET + "." + testName.getMethodName() + "_" + salt;
}

@Override
public Catalog createCatalog() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

since createCatalog is called in setup() which is a non-static method, salt should also be non-static member

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done


private static final int NUM_SHARDS = 10;
private static final int NUM_SHARDS = 1;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will this remove test coverage of sharded case? We can decrease shard / number of records on direct runner but good to keep parallelism on other runners (Dataflow)

cc: @ahmedabu98

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@akashorabek akashorabek marked this pull request as draft April 24, 2025 10:39
@akashorabek akashorabek marked this pull request as ready for review April 24, 2025 11:05
@akashorabek akashorabek marked this pull request as draft April 24, 2025 12:32
@akashorabek akashorabek marked this pull request as ready for review April 24, 2025 13:09
@akashorabek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I don't think that failing tests are related to the changes in this PR

@akashorabek akashorabek requested a review from Abacn April 24, 2025 13:57
@Abacn
Copy link
Contributor

Abacn commented Apr 24, 2025

Let me reopen the pr to re-trigger tests

@Abacn Abacn closed this Apr 24, 2025
@Abacn Abacn reopened this Apr 24, 2025
@akashorabek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Let me reopen the pr to re-trigger tests

@Abacn Thanks. These 2 failures are not related to the pr changes.

@Abacn Abacn merged commit 89d6bc3 into apache:master Apr 24, 2025
29 of 39 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The IcebergIO Integration Tests job is flaky
3 participants