Re: Request for opinions: bug vs feature - change intokenization of yield from

From: Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 14:35:00 +0000
Subject: Re: Request for opinions: bug vs feature - change intokenization of yield from
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message

> On 20 Jul 2024, at 11:30, Tim Düsterhus <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
>> On 7/19/24 00:51, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
>> And frankly, how much code would be affected?  I mean, does anybody
>> actually put a comment between yield and from?  Is there a case
>> where this may make sense?  "Because we can" isn't a strong argument, in
>> my opinion.
> 
> I don't really follow this line of argumentation:
> 
> If folks do not use the syntax anyways, then we do not need to have this discussion, because
> the tools can just ignore it existing. That also means we do not need to revert the change in PHP.
> 
> If folks use the syntax, then reverting the change is a breaking change for them.
> 
> So either the revert is not doing anything at all, or the revert is actively harmful. I do not
> see a situation where reverting the change is a value-add.
> 
> Best regards
> Tim Düsterhus

The value add of the revert is because time is a moving target. We don't think anyone is using
it _yet_, given the circumstances that made this happen. Wait long enough and the only guarantee we
have is entropy.


Thread (32 messages)

« previous php.internals (#124512) next »