On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 22:48 +0200, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Stas Malyshev <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On 9/2/11 1:41 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> >>
> >> I think you missed the referenced [1]:
> >>
> >> [1] Yes, we will still allow building with libmysql and we will fix bugs
> >> reported there and we will verify it works but focus on mysqlnd, as
> >> we're actually handling it already
> >
> > I did not miss it - I do not see what it means. Either we support both - and
> > then for the matter of development and testing nothing changes - or
> > something changes, namely "we remove one moving piece out of the test
> > equation", the moving piece being libmysql - and "remove" means
> > "remove". I
> > just don't see how you can have both of these things at the same time.
>
> I think that Johannes means that mysqld would be the preferred or
> baseline for the mysql tests.
> maybe supporting IE6 would be a good metaphor: you could say that you
> support every browser equally, or you could say that you write your
> stuff for the modern browsers and tests it against IE6 and fix where
> necessary.
> Johannes, is this what you had in mind?
Thanks, I like your analogy and don't have a better one.
johannes
>
> --
> Ferenc Kovács
> @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
>