Hi!
On 9/2/11 2:12 PM, Ulf Wendel wrote:
I think, such a statement is quite a big step towards your test
concerns, Stas. Ultimately, I still don't get what you (Stas) are after
with the test discussion. Have I missed any of your worries?
My concerns is first and foremost to have unit tests passing and compatibility API issues sorted out - such as same functions producing different semantics on libmysql and mysqlnd. This is my primary concern, especially if we want to have beta anytime soon :)
That said, talk about "removing one moving piece out of the test
equation" and comparing libmysql support to universally unsupported and officially considered dead IE6 makes me worried, when it comes from mysql extension maintainers. Your clarification about it in this letter makes clear my concerns are unfounded, which is good. Let's now get back to the first part - the failing tests.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227