On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Kris Craig <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Stas Malyshev <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > > Yeah I know. That doesn't mean I have to like it though lol. ;P
> >
> > You may like it or not like it, but it's established terminology so
> > we're going to use it. Let's not add noise to our lists.
> > --
> > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
> > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
> > (408)454-6900 ext. 227
> >
>
> If we don't critically re-examine "established" ideas now and then, who
> will?
please go with that problem to github, we didn't coined that term, so we
can't really fix it for you.
> You can disagree with me, but please don't belittle other people's
> concerns by dismissing them as "noise."
it is noise on this mailing list, as this isn't the place to fix that term,
even if you are right.
> I raised a legitimate concern that
> was not "unworthy" of discussion. Just because I hold a minority viewpoint
> doesn't make it any less valid and I stand by my posts. Ironically, your
> dismissive comment after the fact only increased the "noise" factor by at
> least two more posts.
>
the thing is that it wasn't your first or second post which regulars would
count as noise, so this time somebody mentioned that you shouldn't do that.
>
> I believe that the majority, including Github, is wrong on this.
yeah, but how can you fix that with lecturing people here?
> That term
> is needlessly confusing in my opinion. I made that point and it didn't
> gain any traction, so like I said I'll just have to suck it up and move
> on. But if you're going to jump in with a, "We're gonna do it this way so
> shut up," then all that's going to do is create animosity and drag this out
> since obviously I"m not about to let such a comment go unchallenged. ;P
>
sigh.
>
> If you want to keep beating this dead horse, I'm game. Otherwise, all the
> arguments have already been made so just let it go. I voiced my concern
> and the majority doesn't share it, so that's that. Time to move on.
>
\o/
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu