Hi!
> And just to clear, I agree with Sara that ! (both for l/d/b and the
> pointer types) should not be redefined to "parameter was passed". But it's
> my understanding that that's not what you're planning.
I didn't have yet a good generic way to handle l/d/b with 'default' - in
many cases for now I prohibited using 'default' in current code in this
context - but if we had some improvement that allows to do it - like
your patch, though not with ! - it would be definitely an improvement.
I'll be done with rest of ZEND_NUM_ARGS() cleanup probably by the end of
next week, and then I could look into integrating your changes, I think
it makes my patch work much better in some cases :)
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227